Teams

McDonald 4.5 18+

2026 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-11vs HANSEN 4.5 WINTER 2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichele Bailey / Michaela Schulz vs Anna Nguyen / Savannah Olson6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Dutot / Elisabeth Walker vs Clare Palen / Nina Lind7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTaylor Jackson / Rachel LaTour vs Brenda Martinson / Natalie Allison6-1, 6-1
2026-03-04vs MansfieldWon 30
W#1 DoublesJodi Schley / Elisabeth Walker vs Sally Leary / Alexis Junker6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Ewers vs Jane Lent6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRachel LaTour vs Gina Carlson6-1, 6-2
2026-02-25vs Jorgenson-Bowles Point TakenWon 32
W#1 DoublesJodi Schley / Amy Mitchell vs Kristin Hartley / Taylor Reiners6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMichele Bailey vs Thao Nguyen Nguyen6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMaggie Niska / Elisabeth Walker vs Alesha Baerenwald / Katie Whalen6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesChristine Conner vs Lauren Madsen3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Dutot / Jennifer Miller vs Isabel Thiner / Theresa Carlson5-7, 4-6
2026-02-12vs Estey-Alexander 4.5 - W2026Won 50
W#1 DoublesSuzie Heideman / Michaela Schulz vs Sofia Terzic / Victoria Bravo7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichele Bailey vs Brooke Hapuku6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJodi Schley / Amy Mitchell vs Genevieve Swanson / Mona Oenning6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRachel LaTour vs Amanda Hiatt6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Dutot / Sara Humann vs Molly Hemes / Cecilia Grass-Neary6-2, 7-6
2026-02-04vs Opfer/Wahlstrand 4.25Won 40
W#1 DoublesMichele Bailey / Suzie Heideman vs Alana Whiteley / Carolyn Dahlman6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKristen Ewers vs Hayley Helberg7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichaela Schulz / Sara Humann vs Carol Wahlstrand / Mallory Lithun6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Mitchell / Rachel LaTour vs Lauren Welch / Gina Boyer6-1, 6-0
2026-01-21vs Buhr 4.5 WinterWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristen Ewers / Michele Bailey vs Sarah Buhr / Maura Smiley7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Mitchell / Maggie Niska vs Lea Blackwell Favor / Lindsey Henderson6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Dutot / Jodi Schley vs Martha Ginder / Theresa Harich6-2, 6-4
2026-01-14vs MansfieldWon 41
W#1 DoublesMichaela Schulz / Suzie Heideman vs Andrea Peterson / Sydney Rott6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKristen Ewers vs Jane Lent7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Humann / Jodi Schley vs Mary Jayne Crocker / Leslie Connelly6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRachel LaTour vs Barbara Brill6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristine Conner / Jennifer Miller vs Shanshan Ge / Lesley Longval3-6, 3-6
2026-01-07vs Jorgenson-Bowles Point TakenWon 40
W#1 DoublesAmy Mitchell / Michaela Schulz vs Kristin Hartley / Jessica Schnabel6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMichele Bailey vs Lauren Madsen6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Dutot / Suzie Heideman vs Alesha Baerenwald / Kristin Nesseth6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRachel LaTour / Kelly Fackel vs Isabel Thiner / Lily Fredericks6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Maggie Niska
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.56
Suzie Heideman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.49
Michele Bailey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.44
Michaela Schulz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.34
Jacqueline Dutot
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.27
Elisabeth Walker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Jodi Schley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.24
Kelly Fackel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Kristen Ewers
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.21
Sara Humann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.19
Rachel LaTour
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Christine Conner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Ewers + Sara Humann4157% games−7.5% vs expected
Suzie Heideman + Jacqueline Dutot404 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Heideman + Michaela Schulz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Niska
23W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
4.64
Suzie Heideman
24W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.56
Michele Bailey
14W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
4.49
Michaela Schulz
22W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Jacqueline Dutot
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Elisabeth Walker
28W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
Jodi Schley
25W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
Kelly Fackel
100W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Kristen Ewers
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Sara Humann
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.21
Rachel LaTour
30W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Christine Conner
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.