Teams

Racquet Club 3

2024 FALL A18&O Daytime Women · FALL 18&O 3.5W Friday

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 3.5W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Tara Iorio
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.42
MacKenzie Skellan
published
3.36
Britt Straka
published 3.5
3.27
Erin Wanke
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Amy Ireton
published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Tscholl
published
3.06
Lindsay J Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.05
Martha Trydahl
published
3.01
Jill Kirila
published
2.99
Tonya Moul
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Tina Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.78
MARISSA BACKES
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brittany Bean
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.61
Krista McKelvey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Jana Lakatos
published
Karissa Hunter
published
Katie Spence
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Trydahl + Britt Straka7063% games+11.3% vs expected
Jana Lakatos + Martha Trydahl182848% games+4.7% vs expected
Tina Schneider + Tonya Moul1542% games+4.4% vs expected
Jana Lakatos + Jennifer Tscholl3546% games+3.9% vs expected
Britt Straka + MacKenzie Skellan451657% games+3.8% vs expected
Jennifer Tscholl + Britt Straka3354% games+2.2% vs expected
Tina Schneider + MARISSA BACKES3547% games+2.0% vs expected
Martha Trydahl + Jennifer Tscholl202546% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tara Iorio
195W–56L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
MacKenzie Skellan
130W–53L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Britt Straka
139W–86L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Erin Wanke
84W–55L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Ireton
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Tscholl
53W–65L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Lindsay J Miller
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Martha Trydahl
61W–76L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Jill Kirila
46W–68L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Tonya Moul
32W–71L career · 1 line in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Tina Schneider
32W–44L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
MARISSA BACKES
27W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Brittany Bean
40W–43L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Krista McKelvey
39W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.61
Jana Lakatos
70W–133L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
2.56
Karissa Hunter
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Spence
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.