Teams

Crawford/LR/Reb

2025 Mixed 18 & Over 3.0, 4.0, 10.0 · 10.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 5.08 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-23vs Ponwith/LR/PVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Murdock / Austin Crawford vs Aaron Hudson / Rebecca Bailey6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTrent Brandon / Melissa Wild vs Scott Eibes / Tatum Rice7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-23vs Ponwith/LR/PVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Murdock / Trent Brandon vs Tatum Rice / Parker Stearns4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarolina Quevedo Aranda / Andrew Conover vs Jesse Ponwith / Austynn Crocker6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPaula Juels Jones / Cole Guy vs Rebecca Bailey / Bishop Bass3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-26vs Ponwith/LR/PVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Murdock / Casey Garretson vs Bishop Bass / Austynn Crocker3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAustin Crawford / Melissa Wild vs Lindsey Ponwith / Scott Eibes6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Conover / Carolina Quevedo Aranda vs Becky Sherman / Jesse Ponwith6-2, 6-3
2025-06-18vs Ponwith/LR/PVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCole Guy / Melissa Wild vs Lindsey Ponwith / Daniel Cornelison0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Juels Jones / Casey Garretson vs Tatum Rice / Parker Stearns6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAshley Murdock / Trent Brandon vs Becky Sherman / Aaron Hudson6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 10.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.73 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carolina Quevedo Aranda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5.5
4.86
Cole Guy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
Andrew Conover
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
Ashley Murdock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
Austin Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
Casey Garretson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.61
Trent Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Wild
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Juels Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Carolina Quevedo Aranda
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Cole Guy
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
4.86
5
Andrew Conover
12W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Ashley Murdock
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Austin Crawford
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Casey Garretson
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trent Brandon
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.61
Melissa Wild
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Juels Jones
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.