Teams

Lakes/Hurd M4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT M Saturday · M4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-08vs JCC/Buchhalter M4.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesOliver Woeste / Paul Clark vs Michael Buchhalter / Michael Roberts4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJeff Ramsey vs Daniel Donati1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGordon Cochrum / Mike Vasilyev vs Dan O'Donnell / Yasha Avshalumov6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Goodman / Tim Hurd vs Steven Hauer / Greg Fay2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-01-18vs Eldorado/Breton-Miles M4.0Won 31
L#1 DoublesJeff Ramsey / Jeremy Mann vs Macey Miles / Mark Fuhrer6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Kessler vs Michael Davidson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChad Leeper / Oliver Woeste vs Alex Clinton / Freddie Perales4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Hurd / Larry Goodman vs Paul Gorman / Bradley Killinger6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Kessler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Chad Leeper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Tim Hurd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Gordon Cochrum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Raul Johnson
published
Jeff Ramsey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Larry Goodman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Vasilyev
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Oliver Woeste
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Clark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Hurd + Mike Vasilyev2438% gamesnot enough data
Tim Hurd + Gordon Cochrum2349% gamesnot enough data
Larry Goodman + Tim Hurd123 matchesnot enough data
Gordon Cochrum + Raul Johnson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Kessler
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Chad Leeper
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Tim Hurd
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Gordon Cochrum
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Raul Johnson
18W–31L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Jeff Ramsey
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Larry Goodman
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Vasilyev
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Oliver Woeste
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Clark
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.