Teams

TOC.Hagopian-Edwards

2024 CTRL Fall Singles 40 & Over · Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-29vs LOCH.TobinWon 30
W#1 SinglesTaqiyya Yasin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDiane Volkmar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKace Martin vs Megan Word6-3, 6-3
2024-11-21vs TOC.IrishSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDiane Volkmar vs Mary T Long6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTaqiyya Yasin vs Dianna White6-4, 6-1
2024-11-07vs TOC.LeahyLost 01
L#3 SinglesKace Martin vs Jennifer Leahy5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-10-17vs TOC.IrishWon 10
W#3 SinglesDiane Volkmar vs Tracy Grasser6-1, 6-2
2024-10-07Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMalinda Hain vs Amy Toland1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJudith Hagopian-Edwards vs Shannon Tobin2-6, 1-6
2024-10-03vs TOC.LeahySplit 11
L#1 SinglesKace Martin vs Lisa Goodman1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesDiane Volkmar vs Anne Grimm6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-19vs TOC.CohenLost 01
L#1 SinglesKace Martin vs Shylaja Karimanye2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Diane Volkmar
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.19
Taqiyya Yasin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.19
Kace Martin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.94
Malinda Hain
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.92
Lisa Swank
published
2.62
Matalaba Napier
published
2.29
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Malinda Hain + Kace Martin2546% gamesnot enough data
Matalaba Napier + Judith Hagopian-Edwards123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Volkmar
54W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.28
3
Taqiyya Yasin
149W–89L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.19
3
Kace Martin
73W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.19
3
Malinda Hain
59W–54L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Lisa Swank
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.92
Matalaba Napier
11W–21L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · 1 line in 2024
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.