Teams

KY/LEX/SENTERS/GRAHAM

2024 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over MIXED LEXINGTON · 3.5 ADULT MIXED

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-06-29vs KY/LEX/Johnson/JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarmen Ignat / Gheorghe Ignat vs Tanya Johnson / Jeff VanderHorst6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-04vs KY/LEX/Johnson/JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarmen Ignat / Gheorghe Ignat vs Janine Coy / Josh Franklin3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 ADULT MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Leah Schrass
published
3.50
Gheorghe Ignat
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Sarah Knight
published
3.40
Jacob Senters
published
3.40
Jose Guijosa
published
3.37
Erin Stoffer
published
3.29
Margaret Bush
published
3.24
Mily Ralsten
published
3.17
Carmen Ignat
published 3.5
3.17
Doris Senters
published
3.12
Stephanie Queen
published
3.08
Johan Graham
published
3.05
Francisco Rangel
published
2.99
Brandi Simon
published 3.5
Morgan Cordray
published
Richard Lane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gheorghe Ignat + Carmen Ignat303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Schrass
22W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Gheorghe Ignat
212W–125L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Sarah Knight
23W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jacob Senters
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jose Guijosa
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
Erin Stoffer
18W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Margaret Bush
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Mily Ralsten
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Carmen Ignat
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Doris Senters
60W–44L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Stephanie Queen
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
Johan Graham
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Francisco Rangel
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.05
3.5
Brandi Simon
0W–10L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Morgan Cordray
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Lane
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.