Teams

ZEPHYR COVE 18AW3.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-06-18vs SOUTH RENO TENNIS 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Irina Woomer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Denise Kowal5-7, 3-6
2023-06-10vs CAUGHLIN 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#2 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Marci Banes2-6, 3-6
2023-06-09Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Katherine Tong3-6, 1-6
2023-06-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Lisa Sussman6-1, 6-1
2023-05-21vs STONEBRAE 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesLea McSweeney / Miriam DeQuadros vs Shelley Buchberger / Kara Crowe6-1, 6-2
2023-04-30vs RENO TENNIS CENTER 18AW3.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheri Von Bargen / Miriam DeQuadros vs Mahnoush Bagheri / MaryLynn Murphy6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-29vs SOUTH RENO TENNIS 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Lisa Fore6-3, 6-1
2023-04-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Catherine Griffin7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-23vs CAUGHLIN 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesBecky Darrow / Miriam DeQuadros vs Marci Banes / Lesley Pittman4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Meng-Lun Tsai1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Cheri Von Bargen
published 4
3.52
Miriam DeQuadros
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.49
Kristy Wertz
published
3.38
Shelley Lober
published
3.36
Tamara Crawford
published
3.33
Becky Darrow
published 3.5
3.29
Rhoda Shaponik
published
3.27
Dianne Dalton
published 3.5
3.24
Liz Bissell
published
3.10
Cecille Florentino
published 3.5
2.73
Barbara Cooper
published 3
Kay Warneke
published
Mary Evans
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Crawford + Becky Darrow303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheri Von Bargen
11W–0L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
Miriam DeQuadros
126W–100L career · 16 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Kristy Wertz
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Shelley Lober
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Tamara Crawford
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Becky Darrow
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Rhoda Shaponik
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.29
3.5
Dianne Dalton
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Liz Bissell
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Cecille Florentino
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Barbara Cooper
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Kay Warneke
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Evans
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.