Teams

Liberty Park-For the Love

2025 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 2.5W

14 players · average NTRP 2.60 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-20vs Cottonwood Club - Special KWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenna Pike / Adri Soffe vs Sandra Sweetland / Kristin Rocke6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAli Love / Kimberly Chytraus vs Kristine Johnson / Crystal Connors6-3, 6-5
W#3 DoublesAshley Theodore / Tiffany Rodriguez vs Kristin Bretz / Katie Mikula4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-12-13vs Liberty Park-En FuegoWon 21
W#1 DoublesShelby Hales / Ali Love vs Ann Monroy / Elizabeth Robinson6-4, 4-2
W#2 DoublesJenna Pike / Adri Soffe vs Trena Anderson / Janelle Freund7-6, 4-2
L#3 DoublesTiffany Rodriguez / Marilee Garff vs Heather Gough / Lacey Johnson1-6, 5-7
2025-12-06vs Level UpLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Heap / Ali Love vs Kassidy Oasay / Keerstin Smith3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Fletcher / Heather Wissler vs Amy Gadberry / Rachael Gilmore2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Montero / Tiffany Rodriguez vs Marina Denton / Sanjana Ramesh6-0, 6-1
2025-11-15vs Sports Mall-Team FunWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Montero / Susan Heap vs Jenna DeLong / Tejaswini Vaidya6-7, 1-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJenna Pike / Heather Wissler vs Karen Weyman / Madison Milligan4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAdri Soffe / Stacy Harbertson vs Hailey Jensen / Diana Xiaowen Yang6-2, 6-2
2025-11-08vs SL Tennis-TurnbowWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Montero / Angela Fletcher vs Brooke Louis / Emily Lammers6-4, 5-3
L#2 DoublesMarilee Garff / Ashley Theodore vs Sarah Turnbow / Victoria Rosdahl1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTiffany Rodriguez / Shelby Hales vs Venae Rosdahl / Capri Dahle6-2, 6-1
2025-11-01vs Liberty Park-En FuegoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Heap / Heather Wissler vs Alicia Miller / Ann Monroy3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly Chytraus / Ashley Theodore vs Debbie Beckstrom / Heather Gough6-7, 1-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park-For the Love4211718148
2Cottonwood Club - Special K3381020158
3SL Tennis-Turnbow1561225167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Christina Montero
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.68
Sandy Weeks
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.61
Shelby Hales
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Ali Love
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.41
Stacy Harbertson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Susan Heap
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Jenna Pike
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Adri Soffe
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.17
Marilee Garff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.13
Kimberly Chytraus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Angela Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.07
Heather Wissler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.00
Tiffany Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Ashley Theodore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ali Love + Sandy Weeks6353% games+12.7% vs expected
Kimberly Chytraus + Sandy Weeks7748% games+11.4% vs expected
Heather Wissler + Susan Heap5348% games+7.9% vs expected
Stacy Harbertson + Shelby Hales4257% games+6.4% vs expected
Kimberly Chytraus + Heather Wissler2932% games−9.8% vs expected
Angela Fletcher + Ashley Theodore1434% gamesnot enough data
Ali Love + Kimberly Chytraus314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Chytraus + Angela Fletcher224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christina Montero
35W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Sandy Weeks
67W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Shelby Hales
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%22%78%
2.61
2.5
Ali Love
16W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51
Stacy Harbertson
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Susan Heap
34W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Jenna Pike
32W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Adri Soffe
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Marilee Garff
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Kimberly Chytraus
26W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Angela Fletcher
14W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Heather Wissler
17W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Tiffany Rodriguez
10W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Ashley Theodore
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.