Teams

Ltc - Erin/Andrea

2022 Broward Combo 50 & Over · 9.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.64 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-27vs Veltri - JillWon 10
W#2 DoublesBetty Brener / Sherril Colombo vs Lillie Hileman / Krista Geoffrion4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-08-13vs Veltri - JillLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodi Appelbaum-Steinbauer / Andrea Cornelissen vs Giselle Asplundh / Tanja Gustafson3-6, 1-6
2022-07-30vs Veltri - JillWon 20
W#1 DoublesBetty Brener / Sherril Colombo vs Lillie Hileman / Krista Geoffrion4-2
W#2 DoublesAndrea Cornelissen / Jane Forman vs Veronica Wank / RENEE ALEXIS6-1, 7-5
2022-07-09vs Veltri - JillLost 02
L#1 DoublesBetty Brener / Janine Burke vs Giselle Asplundh / Tanja Gustafson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Cornelissen / Cheryl Hicks vs Sharon Runk / Deanne Decker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Betty Brener
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.50
Erin Manten
published 5
4.46
Colette Kienle
published 4.5
4.37
Andrea Cornelissen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.27
Janine Burke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Cheryl Hicks
published 4.5
4.09
Sherril Colombo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Barbara Cabral
published 4.5
Jane Forman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betty Brener + Janine Burke6454% games−2.0% vs expected
Sherril Colombo + Janine Burke303 matchesnot enough data
Erin Manten + Janine Burke303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Betty Brener
29W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Erin Manten
98W–68L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
4.50
4.5
Colette Kienle
41W–43L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Andrea Cornelissen
70W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Janine Burke
266W–184L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Cheryl Hicks
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherril Colombo
63W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Barbara Cabral
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
4.09
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.