Teams

MMacdonald-HS

2026 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-14vs DOrdronneau-TOCHWon 30
W#1 SinglesShira Katsir vs Cecilia Gonzales7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMary Macdonald vs Lori Salzmann7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Angela Boone6-0, 6-3
2026-06-30vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesShira Katsir vs Cecily Peterson6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMary Macdonald vs Betsy Euler5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Barbara Wilhelm2-6, 1-6
2026-06-25vs GLoFrese-TOCHLost 12
L#1 SinglesShira Katsir vs Hannah Harvey4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMary Macdonald vs Alexa Hartenstein6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Gretchen LoFrese4-6, 1-6
2026-06-11vs CMurray-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesMary Macdonald vs Jennifer Dunlap4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Lindsey McIver1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesLinda Naden vs Eniko Nagy0-6, 1-6
2026-06-04vs JRanheim-TOCHWon 21
W#1 SinglesAltagracia Evert vs Jamie Scaglione6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesShira Katsir vs Kim Hutter6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKathy Holt vs Pamela Howell-Davis6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-28vs LGilchrist-CHCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAltagracia Evert vs Sarah Sapeta4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKathy Holt vs Linda Gilchrist7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-28vs MFulton-UNCLost 12
W#1 SinglesShira Katsir vs Sara Knechtel7-6, 6-0
L#2 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Meghan Fulton2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesLinda Naden vs Virginia Wang4-6, 6-7
2026-05-16vs SBartle-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesAltagracia Evert vs Shannon Bartle6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMary Macdonald vs Liz Schaller7-6, 6-3
L#3 SinglesLinda Naden vs Susanne Schmal1-6, 3-6
2026-05-14vs MLong-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesAltagracia Evert vs Kinsey Wennerstrom3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Dora Gosselin6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKathy Holt vs Susan Brogden1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1JRanheim-TOCH63151225194
2DOrdronneau-TOCH54141328229
3MMacdonald-HS36121533254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Mary Macdonald
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.84
Altagracia Evert
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.77
Shira Katsir
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.66
Tynita Edwards
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.51
Kathy Holt
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.32
Linda Naden
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Altagracia Evert + Tynita Edwards5163% gamesnot enough data
Altagracia Evert + Shira Katsir123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Macdonald
15W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Altagracia Evert
74W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Shira Katsir
31W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Tynita Edwards
100W–92L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Kathy Holt
25W–62L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
Linda Naden
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.