Teams

TeamForman

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.0 Adult Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.32 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Nathalia Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.50
Emily Albanese
published
3.43
Melissa Morim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Patty Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.30
Adriana Monsalve
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.26
Andrea Tovar
published 3.5
3.25
Claudia Donnelly
published 3.5
3.23
Geraldine Blakely
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 3
3.14
Ellen Fine
published
3.12
Veronica Estrada
published
3.11
Paola Campanella
published
3.05
Sima Sadoughi
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Roselin Barrena
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.00
Julia Sturm
published
2.87
Patricia Carroll-Tzakis
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Maria Celeste Arraras
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Sara Contreras
published
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Monsalve + Geraldine Blakely5172% games+16.3% vs expected
Geraldine Blakely + Ellen Fine7268% games+10.1% vs expected
Patty Gonzalez + Melissa Morim14265% games+7.3% vs expected
Claudia Donnelly + Patty Gonzalez3255% games+5.5% vs expected
Nathalia Blanco + Emily Albanese351161% games+3.3% vs expected
Sima Sadoughi + Patricia Carroll-Tzakis11562% gamesnot enough data
Roselin Barrena + Maria Celeste Arraras5845% gamesnot enough data
Nathalia Blanco + Patty Gonzalez7356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nathalia Blanco
323W–115L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Emily Albanese
30W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Melissa Morim
210W–96L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Patty Gonzalez
92W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Adriana Monsalve
181W–83L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Tovar
30W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Claudia Donnelly
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3
Geraldine Blakely
134W–53L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Ellen Fine
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Veronica Estrada
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.12
Paola Campanella
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Sima Sadoughi
207W–136L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Roselin Barrena
88W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Julia Sturm
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Patricia Carroll-Tzakis
197W–132L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Maria Celeste Arraras
62W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Sara Contreras
20W–28L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.