Teams

HERM-Shriner

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-19vs MAC-RobertsWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Clifton / Sandra Dollar Shriner vs Debbie Messmer / Dylan Brod7-6, 6-1
2022-03-06vs WO-CalamitaLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristy Bauer / Nicholas Hardesty vs Stephen Mathews / Laura Granger6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-27vs ACAC-SipeWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandra Dollar Shriner / Stephen Clifton vs Jimmy Ghaphery / Kathie Naylor6-4, 6-0
2022-02-26vs MAC-SnowWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandra Dollar Shriner / Mac Stuckey vs Chuck Snow / Mary Scott6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Hamant / Kristy Bauer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-30vs ACAC-FulcherWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandra Dollar Shriner / Stephen Clifton vs Stuart Fulcher / Jennifer Flournoy6-2, 6-3
2022-01-23vs BURK-KampingaLost 01
L#2 DoublesPhilip Rackliffe / Kristy Bauer vs Brian Culley / Jennifer Owens4-6, 2-6
2022-01-22vs CCV-AtiyehWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandra Dollar Shriner / Philip Rackliffe vs Karen Williamson / Randy Williamson6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Sandra Dollar Shriner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.87
Mac Stuckey
published
3.73
Kristy Bauer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Sanjeev Vohra
published
3.67
Sally Caldwell
published 4
3.65
Addie Miller
published 4
3.62
Kurt Williams
published
3.60
Pam Walsh
published
3.60
Steve Hamant
published
Douglas Gray
published 3.5
Judi Baker
published
Marykay Stainback
published
Philip Rackliffe
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sandra Dollar Shriner
61W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.98
Mac Stuckey
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Kristy Bauer
57W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Sanjeev Vohra
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Sally Caldwell
42W–44L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Addie Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Kurt Williams
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Pam Walsh
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.60
Steve Hamant
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Douglas Gray
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Judi Baker
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marykay Stainback
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Philip Rackliffe
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.