Teams

RVR BLUE

2025 USTA TRI-LEVEL - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5-4.0-4.5 TRI LEVEL - MOUNTAINS

10 players · average NTRP 3.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-19vs HCC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Cheney / Laurie Feler vs Heidi Jobson / Susie Kokoska5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJudy Spasser / Patricia Dudley vs Laura Caldwell / Michele Jarnot6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDianne Leoni / Barb Lansky vs Janine Treu / Erin Boselli7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-12vs HCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaurie Feler / Sarah Shook vs Heidi Jobson / Susie Kokoska4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Dudley / Nancy Zeigel vs Jen Jewett / Patricia McNamara5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Bailey / Barb Lansky vs Chapin Benway / Erin Boselli6-1, 6-3
2025-08-05vs HCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Cheney / Sarah Shook vs Kim Anderson / Heidi Jobson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Zeigel / Patricia Dudley vs Carrie Benway / Patricia McNamara6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDianne Leoni / Barb Lansky vs Tammy Schiff / Chapin Benway6-2, 6-2
2025-07-29vs HCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Cheney / Laurie Feler vs Kim Anderson / Heidi Jobson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJudy Spasser / Nancy Zeigel vs Laura Caldwell / Susie Kokoska5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Boat / Katie Bailey vs Chapin Benway / Shannon Fedrizzi6-3, 7-5
2025-07-22vs HCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Shook / Laurie Feler vs Polly Hastie / Susie Kokoska6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsey Cheney / Nancy Zeigel vs Carrie Benway / Michele Jarnot6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDiane Boat / Katie Bailey vs Janine Treu / Jill Moneypenny6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-15vs HCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Cheney / Sarah Shook vs Polly Hastie / Jen Jewett6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLindsey Cheney / Judy Spasser vs Janine Treu / Sarah Zurbay7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiane Boat / Dianne Leoni vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5-4.0-4.5 TRI LEVEL - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Sarah Shook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Laurie Feler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Judy Spasser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Nancy Zeigel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Katie Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Lindsey Cheney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Dianne Leoni
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Barb Lansky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Diane Boat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Patricia Dudley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Zeigel + Judy Spasser11358% games+4.4% vs expected
Diane Boat + Dianne Leoni3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sarah Shook
35W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Laurie Feler
42W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4
Judy Spasser
54W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Nancy Zeigel
63W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Katie Bailey
18W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Lindsey Cheney
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Dianne Leoni
27W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Barb Lansky
38W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Diane Boat
50W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Patricia Dudley
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.