Teams

Pirates of HCC/ Russian

2026 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-02vs Sun City Center/ K. JohnsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarlyle Gallimore / Juan J Montoya vs KEVIN JOHNSON / Michael Nugent6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFreddy Russian / Gerald Bliss vs Mark Nelson / Qin Yang6-3, 6-3
2026-04-29vs Temple Terrace / JenkinsWon 40
W#1 DoublesJeromy Waite / Tom Foran vs Steven Jenkins / Peter Trakas6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLeonardo Guim V vs Walter Norwood6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMark Gibson / Gerald Bliss vs Patrick Rairigh / Daniel Shields6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFreddy Russian / Santiago Arcila vs Lawrence Palombo / Rick Burkhart7-6, 6-4
2026-04-11vs HILLS/SchneiderLost 13
W#1 DoublesTom Foran / Santiago Arcila vs Max Collazo / Johnny Fung7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCarlyle Gallimore vs Dustin Applebaum3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMark Gibson / Gerald Bliss vs Jacob Munch / James Baker2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesFreddy Russian / Leonardo Guim V vs Alan Chin / Jeff Conston1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jeromy Waite
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Santiago Arcila
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Tom Foran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Mark Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
Bill McLendon
published 3.5
Carlyle Gallimore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Gerald Bliss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Miguel Montoya
published
3.19
Juan J Montoya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Leonardo Guim V
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.14
Freddy Russian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Dino Mirabal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Foran + Jeromy Waite5164% games+14.2% vs expected
Miguel Montoya + Juan J Montoya3353% games+8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeromy Waite
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Santiago Arcila
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Tom Foran
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Mark Gibson
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Bill McLendon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Carlyle Gallimore
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gerald Bliss
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Miguel Montoya
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Juan J Montoya
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Leonardo Guim V
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Freddy Russian
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Dino Mirabal
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.