Teams

CSRC THORNTON

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-08vs CCW WARDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Haynie / Carmen Ekblad vs Mary Robins / Tracy Slater2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Carpenter / Shelly Schmidt vs Kristi Couture / Erin Contreras2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Fredell / Dianna Farquharson vs Shelly Shepard / Kele Hauke6-1, 6-2
2026-06-01vs GOG WAYBRIGHTWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Sara Callender vs Elizabeth Price / Shannon Leifer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Carpenter / Shelly Schmidt vs Jane Ridings / Chris Waybright6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVicki Gess / Julie Thornton vs Christine Chiacchia / Karen Pennell2-6, 2-6
2026-05-25vs CSRC ANDERSONWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Julie Haynie vs Marian Nelson / Martha Walker6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDiane Fredell / Dianna Farquharson vs Terri Plummer / Jenny McCabe6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesVicki Gess / Carol Presicci vs Myra Cobb / Carol Young6-2, 6-0
2026-05-18vs CCOC SIMMONSLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Fredell / Shelly Schmidt vs Barbara Jean Knorr / Mary Vanryzin1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSue Arntzen / Julie Thornton vs Judy Mitchell / Patty Schlesinger2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Carpenter / Sara Callender vs Suzanne Book / Irene Larimer6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2026-05-04vs CCW WARDWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Julie Haynie vs Erin Contreras / Kele Hauke4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Edgar / Jane Wisner vs Shelly Shepard / Tracy Slater5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDianna Farquharson / Sara Callender vs Maggie Ward / Kristi Couture6-2, 6-0
2026-04-27vs GOG WAYBRIGHTWon 21
L#1 DoublesSue Arntzen / Shelly Schmidt vs Jane Ridings / Shannon Leifer0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Edgar / Jane Wisner vs Karen Pennell / Elizabeth Price3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Presicci / Vicki Gess vs Christine Chiacchia / Jill Hoover6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCW WARD5113514137
2CSRC THORNTON4211718148
3CCOC SIMMONS3311718142
4GOG WAYBRIGHT2471125172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Dianna Farquharson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Carmen Ekblad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Julie Haynie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Diane Fredell
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Jennifer Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Sue Arntzen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Carol Presicci
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Jane Wisner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Linda Edgar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Sara Callender
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Vicki Gess
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Julie Thornton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Wisner + Linda Edgar312553% games−1.0% vs expected
Sara Callender + Sue Arntzen3348% games−3.1% vs expected
Jennifer Carpenter + Sara Callender5352% gamesnot enough data
Julie Haynie + Carmen Ekblad4157% gamesnot enough data
Jane Wisner + Carmen Ekblad224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Carpenter + Vicki Gess134 matchesnot enough data
Sue Arntzen + Julie Haynie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dianna Farquharson
13W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Carmen Ekblad
81W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Julie Haynie
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Diane Fredell
20W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Jennifer Carpenter
27W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Sue Arntzen
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Carol Presicci
14W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jane Wisner
89W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
Linda Edgar
36W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Sara Callender
20W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Vicki Gess
54W–58L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Julie Thornton
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.