Teams

Dallas/JB/AP

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over Novice · 2.5 Women's Novice

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-02vs Carpenter/JB/RPCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesJune Long vs Shallen Gorman1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Fowler vs Taylor Elliott0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKylie DeVries vs Angela Deveney6-1, 6-0
2025-11-17vs Sharp-Ishmael/JB/APWon 21
L#1 SinglesVeronica Trimarchi vs Jami Sharp0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKylie DeVries vs Lindsay Massey6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRylee Bailey vs Kristie Becker6-2, 6-1
2025-11-12vs Sharp-Ishmael/JB/APLost 12
L#1 SinglesSharika Minor vs Jami Sharp0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesVeronica Trimarchi vs Alyssa Ishmael0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesJune Long vs Kristie Becker2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-11vs Cissell/JB/APLost 12
L#1 SinglesSharika Minor vs Beth McCartney2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Fowler vs Madison Mckisson1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesKylie DeVries vs Maleigh Inboden6-2, 6-3
2025-11-04vs Carpenter/JB/RPCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesArielle Nast vs Erin Gibson6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSharika Minor vs Taylor Elliott6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJune Long vs Ashley Snider7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-10-21vs Cissell/JB/APLost 12
L#1 SinglesArielle Nast vs Caitlin Sullins7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKylie DeVries vs Maleigh Inboden6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesSarah Fowler vs Samantha Spillman1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women's Novice
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cissell/JB/AP4211715133
2Sharp-Ishmael/JB/AP4210817113
3Dallas/JB/AP2481021161
4Carpenter/JB/RPCC2471124178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Cherry Dallas
published 3.5
2.60
Kylie DeVries
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.22
Arielle Nast
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
June Long
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.13
Sharika Minor
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.04
Sarah Fowler
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Meghan Hammons
published
Rylee Bailey
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Veronica Trimarchi
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cherry Dallas
21W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Kylie DeVries
35W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%22%78%
2.60
2.5
Arielle Nast
9W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
June Long
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
Sharika Minor
8W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Sarah Fowler
4W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Meghan Hammons
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rylee Bailey
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Trimarchi
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.