← Teams

MAC-Jones

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.69 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Scott Lenker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Jonathan Barg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Bill Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.36
Tom Sloan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Glenn Eisen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Devin Tau
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Mark Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
—
Stephen Mileham
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 0
Results7 ties
2019-07-03Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesJonathan Barg / Bill Henderson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesGlenn Eisen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEdward Lang / Scott Lenker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMark Meyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-06-08Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesBrian Jones / Bill Henderson vs Larry Benedict / Jeremy Goodson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesZachary Wright / Stephen Mileham vs Rick Wedan / Aman Wasu6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDevin Tau vs Dave Bobbett4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-06-01Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBill Henderson / Mark Stromme vs Jason Ruhmann / Adam Gamboa7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobert Buys / Zachary Wright vs Scott Pennington / Shaun Zhang6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesScott Lenker / Stephen Mileham vs Chris Collins / Brad Ouderkirk5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2019-05-19Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesBrian Jones / Bill Henderson vs Vimal Natarajan / Deepak Selvanathan6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGlenn Eisen / Jack Menashe vs Michael Didner / Loc Hotan6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDevin Tau vs Mitchell Whitehurst6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWalt Crate / Scott Lenker vs Kevin Fraczek / Szuchi Wu6-4, 6-3
2019-05-08Won 2–1
W#2 DoublesZachary Wright / Walt Crate vs Chris Collins / David Greenberg6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDevin Tau vs John Droege6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJonathan Barg / Bill Henderson vs Shaun Zhang / Michael Jung5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2019-05-05Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMark Meyer / Zachary Wright vs Michael Kazangian / Alan Jones6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJonathan Barg / Bill Henderson vs Vincent Scopacasa / Francisco Rivera-Giusti6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2019-04-27Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesJonathan Barg / Mark Stromme vs Tak Hirano / Mosur Mohan7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDevin Tau vs Vivek Kashyap7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBill Henderson / Robert Buys vs Steven Keo / Rick Ward6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Meyer / Zachary Wright vs Nagaraj Sathyanarayan / Basheer Ahmed Muddebihal6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Scott Lenker
46W–24L career
1%97%2%
3.80
4
Jonathan Barg
24W–43L career
29%71%0%
3.54
4
Bill Henderson
108W–120L career
46%54%0%
3.46
3.5
Tom Sloan
65W–40L career
0%94%5%
3.36
3.5
Glenn Eisen
57W–50L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17
3.5
Devin Tau
23W–42L career
11%89%0%
3.14
3.5
Mark Meyer
37W–43L career
22%78%0%
3.07
0
Stephen Mileham
35W–28L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.