Teams

LBK Public Serve-ivors

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 8.0 W Thursday

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-20vs Cedars Island GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRhonda Snow / Linda Steen vs Brenda Baril / Patricia OConnell6-2, 6-1
2025-03-13vs Sarasota/Hagopian/55&Over8.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesRhonda Snow / Patty Hayes vs Karen Collins / Diana Stadelnikas6-1, 6-0
2025-03-06vs Payne Park SeiderWon 10
W#1 DoublesRhonda Snow / Patty Hayes vs Donna Hannigan / Susan Kimball6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-27vs SSC DavySplit 11
W#1 DoublesRhonda Snow / Linda Steen vs Tambra Ford / Roberta Smith6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Candice Sennecke vs Jennifer Butcher / Sheila Engert5-7, 0-6
2025-02-20vs Plantation DipierroLost 01
L#2 DoublesRhonda Snow / Patty Hayes vs Janet Kramer / Lesli Andrews4-6, 2-6
2025-02-13vs River Strand QuirosWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Steen / Rhonda Snow vs Penny Franklin / Kara Beene6-2, 6-2
2025-02-06vs Waterford DuncanWon 10
W#1 DoublesRhonda Snow / Linda Steen vs Lisa Klemeyer / Robyn Rhodes6-2, 6-2
2025-02-03vs LWR SosaWon 20
W#1 DoublesRhonda Snow / Mary Jane Waite vs Donna Dubinsky / Hayley Englander6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Candice Sennecke vs Kathy Rain / Andrea Deitch2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-09vs Esplanade HennessyWon 20
W#2 DoublesRhonda Snow / Jackie Gibbins vs Leslie Miller / Sandy Kreighbaum6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCandice Sennecke / Sandy Schonhoff vs Nancy Musson / Shelley Finley7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Audra Ramsey
published 4
Candice Sennecke
published 4
3.67
Mary Jane Waite
published
3.49
Margaret West
published
3.48
Stephanie Almeida
published
Jackie Gibbins
published
Karen Kurgan
published
Linda Steen
published
Nancy Smith
published
Rhonda Snow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Duryea
published
Sandy Schonhoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sue Campbell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audra Ramsey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Candice Sennecke
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Jane Waite
50W–38L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Margaret West
82W–76L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Stephanie Almeida
3W–14L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.48
Jackie Gibbins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Kurgan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Steen
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Smith
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Snow
32W–20L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Duryea
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Schonhoff
45W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Campbell
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.