Teams

JMontague-DUR

2026 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd

14 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-25vs TKharva-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Conor Lynch6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteve Haine / Christopher Rogge vs Ryan Curet / Jordan Curet2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEthan Holston / Gary Fye vs Joshua Hunter / Antonio Parham6-3, 6-2
2026-04-12vs DVyas-DURLost 01
L#2 SinglesJAMES MONTAGUE vs Josh Jones0-6, 1-6
2026-04-11vs JByrd-DURLost 02
L#1 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Christopher Rogge vs Aaron Kirschenfeld / Edward Bernier5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesConor Kregecz vs Matthew Curry6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-28vs JByrd2-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Conor Kregecz vs Philip Rosenberg / Stacy Bowden6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGary Fye / Rick Edmunds vs David Belcher / Sagar Mistry6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTanner Dellinger / Zach Rowles vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-21vs NPuri18-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Conor Kregecz vs Vishal Gupta / Rajeev Tonde6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMontgomery Fletcher / Tanner Dellinger vs Vijay Sharma / Divy D2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGary Fye / Christopher Rogge vs Nishant Puri / Arjun Saha6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-14vs ELanghans-DURSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTanner Dellinger / Arash Chehrazi vs Eric Langhans / Jacob McLennan6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesChristopher Rogge / Rick Edmunds vs Alex Sizemore / Cooper Norris6-3, 6-1
2026-03-07vs JPobst-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesMontgomery Fletcher / Arash Chehrazi vs Jeff Pobst / Matthew Ruterbories6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesConor Kregecz / Tanner Dellinger vs Jordin Peiffer / Henrique Perez6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChristopher Rogge / Rick Edmunds vs Pete Gryson / Stephen Mills6-3, 6-4
2026-03-04vs MFossum-HRWon 50
W#1 DoublesAnthony Womack / Michael Ratliff vs Chip McCorkle / Andrew Curso6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMontgomery Fletcher vs Rory Dowling6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Steve Haine vs Jefferson Balin / Mark Fossum7-6
W#2 SinglesConor Kregecz vs Caleb Kent6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEthan Holston / Alexander Zarley vs Rob McGarrah / Christopher Buccafusco6-1, 6-4
2026-02-14vs SPanthri-DURLost 13
L#1 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Steve Haine vs Adam Bernstein - (DQ) / Krupal Shah1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Kevin Kokal6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTanner Dellinger / Anthony Womack vs Shivam Panthri / Rajeev Bhogadi6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGary Fye / Zach Rowles vs Neeraj Singh / Kaushik Vemulapalli6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Conor Kregecz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.51
Montgomery Fletcher
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.48
Michael Ratliff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Alexander Zarley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Anthony Womack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Zach Rowles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Arash Chehrazi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Christopher Rogge
published 3.5
3.26
Ethan Holston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Steve Haine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Tanner Dellinger
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Gary Fye
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Rick Edmunds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Haine + JAMES MONTAGUE4250% gamesnot enough data
Steve Haine + Rick Edmunds2348% gamesnot enough data
Rick Edmunds + Arash Chehrazi213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Ratliff + Montgomery Fletcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Conor Kregecz
69W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.60
Montgomery Fletcher
26W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Michael Ratliff
23W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Alexander Zarley
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Anthony Womack
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Zach Rowles
107W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Arash Chehrazi
87W–56L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Christopher Rogge
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Ethan Holston
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Steve Haine
52W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Tanner Dellinger
37W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Gary Fye
166W–105L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Rick Edmunds
76W–92L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.