Teams

What-a-Racquet

Adult 55 and over · 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-14vs 3.75sWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Guralchuk / Emmanuel Joson vs Pete Hance / Gerry Burns6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTony Wong / Jonathan Levin vs Thomas Ritter / Rick Farris6-2, 6-1
2026-01-10vs 3.75sWon 20
W#1 DoublesScott DeNardo / Karl Ritter vs Steven Farnesi / Kensler Telfort6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHarindra Weerakkody / Tony OMalley vs Pete Hance / Gerry Burns6-3, 6-3
2026-01-03vs 3.75sWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott DeNardo / Jonathan Levin vs Kensler Telfort / Matthew Ricks6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Guralchuk / Mike Kelly vs Pete Hance / Steven Farnesi6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBruce Hendershot / Robert MacAluso vs Gerry Burns / Thomas Ritter6-0, 6-1
2025-12-20vs 3.75sWon 20
W#1 DoublesTony Wong / Emmanuel Joson vs Rick Farris / Pete Hance7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlex Mamutuk / Robert MacAluso vs Steven Farnesi / Jonathan Pranitis6-0, 6-2
2025-12-13vs 3.75sWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Kelly / Tony OMalley vs Gerry Burns / Steven Farnesi6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEric van Hoven / Harindra Weerakkody vs Jonathan Pranitis / Thomas Ritter6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBruce Hendershot / Karl Ritter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-12-06vs 3.75sWon 20
W#1 DoublesBruce Hendershot / Alex Mamutuk vs Jesus Castillo / Pete Hance6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTony Wong / Karl Ritter vs Matthew Ricks / Thomas Ritter6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1What-a-Racquet06180045
23.75s0601836217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Scott DeNardo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Harindra Weerakkody
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Bruce Hendershot
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Alex Mamutuk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
David Guralchuk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Robert MacAluso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Eric van Hoven
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emmanuel Joson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Levin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karl Ritter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tony OMalley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tony Wong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alex Mamutuk + Bruce Hendershot303 matchesnot enough data
Eric van Hoven + David Guralchuk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott DeNardo
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Harindra Weerakkody
43W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Bruce Hendershot
45W–119L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Alex Mamutuk
36W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
David Guralchuk
41W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Robert MacAluso
42W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Eric van Hoven
45W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Emmanuel Joson
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Levin
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karl Ritter
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tony OMalley
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tony Wong
29W–32L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.