Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Warburton/Martin

2025 Winter League-Saturday · 3.5M Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 3.43 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-29vs Eccles Tennis Center-ThomasWon 30
W#1 DoublesChase Maeser / Patrick Warburton vs Clay Snaza / Matthew Duckworth6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHudson Martin / John Pylidis vs Tadd Killpack / Jordan Parker6-4, 5-2
W#3 DoublesSimeon Thomas / Roman Menchikov vs Mark Pett / Scott Olsen7-6, 4-1
2025-03-22vs Ogden-Christensen/LayLost 12
W#1 DoublesManti Hansen / Chase Maeser vs Logan Roberts / Trent Madsen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMyles Ozo / Thomas Smith vs Shawn Lay / Kyle Robbins6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEric Danielson / Anthony Valencia vs Mosaati Vuki / Craig Christensen3-6, 2-6
2025-03-08vs Sports Mall-Sato/SatoLost 02
L#2 DoublesChase Maeser / Dylan Richardson vs Garrett Snyder / Bob Ziroll4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Pylidis / Roman Menchikov vs Yuxian Li / Karthik Kasiviswanathan2-6, 1-6
2025-03-01vs Sunpro-Faux/McGillWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarty Pye / Thomas Smith vs Kaden Henry / David McGill6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesManti Hansen / Myles Ozo vs Ron Beeson / Jason Sundberg6-1, 6-1
2025-02-22vs Salt Lake Tennis-SmithWon 20
W#2 DoublesManti Hansen / Eric Danielson vs Romney Black / Scott Aucutt7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesConner Smith / Myles Ozo vs Collin Begley / Jesse Christensen6-3, 6-1
2025-02-08vs Sports Mall-InouyeLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Danielson / Manti Hansen vs Joshua Heaton / Thomas Young1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Warburton / Roman Menchikov vs Kevin Day / Daniel Inouye5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Pylidis / Anthony Valencia vs Adam Boyle / Oliver Duran1-6, 3-6
2025-02-01vs Eccles Tennis Center-ThomasWon 30
W#1 DoublesHudson Martin / Marty Pye vs Mark Pett / Clay Snaza6-3, 4-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChase Maeser / Conner Smith vs Bradley Bolster / Jordan Parker6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRoman Menchikov / Dylan Richardson vs Tadd Killpack / Matthew Thomas7-5, 1-5, 1-0
2025-01-25vs Salt Lake Tennis-Heller/IsazaLost 03
L#1 DoublesManti Hansen / Patrick Warburton vs Michael Bosnar / Donald Bayna2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrady Patrick / Chase Maeser vs Michael Isaza / Dali Licul3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMyles Ozo / Anthony Valencia vs Ryan Miller / Dan Murray2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Manti Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
Hudson Martin
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.49
Conner Smith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Chase Maeser
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Patrick Warburton
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.22
Marty Pye
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Brady Patrick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Myles Ozo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.15
Anthony Valencia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Dylan Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Simeon Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
John Pylidis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Eric Danielson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roman Menchikov
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chase Maeser + Conner Smith4166% games+16.3% vs expected
Hudson Martin + Manti Hansen8169% games+16.1% vs expected
Dylan Richardson + Conner Smith7070% games+14.9% vs expected
Dylan Richardson + Simeon Thomas7258% games+8.1% vs expected
Chase Maeser + Marty Pye5053% games+7.9% vs expected
Chase Maeser + Hudson Martin6159% games+7.2% vs expected
Chase Maeser + Manti Hansen314 matchesnot enough data
Hudson Martin + John Pylidis314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Manti Hansen
124W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Hudson Martin
56W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Conner Smith
38W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Chase Maeser
30W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Patrick Warburton
38W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Marty Pye
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Brady Patrick
90W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Myles Ozo
73W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
3.5
Anthony Valencia
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Dylan Richardson
52W–48L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Simeon Thomas
34W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
John Pylidis
15W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Eric Danielson
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roman Menchikov
13W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Smith
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.