Teams

BLACKHAWK CC 40MX7.0A

2023 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Allyson Garcia
published 4
3.65
Mimi King
published
3.61
Ganesh Nair
published
3.58
Kelley Krock
published
3.53
Ashok Ganesan
published 3.5
3.52
Joseph Kardek
published
3.52
Robert Greer
published
3.45
Susie Williamson
published
3.43
Judy Theriault
published
3.38
Shashanna Singh
published
3.33
Rob Thomas
published
3.31
Saurabh Shrivastava
published
3.30
Ramya Jayaraman
published
3.27
David Hsieh
published 3.5
3.19
Rose Spicer
published
3.16
Gregory de la Pena
published
3.15
Julie Lassig
published
3.12
Wendy Greer
published
3.02
Odette Kardek
published
2.62
Jim Plewa
published
Francisco Marin
published
Gregory Maroulas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashok Ganesan + Ramya Jayaraman4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allyson Garcia
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.95
Mimi King
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Ganesh Nair
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Kelley Krock
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Ashok Ganesan
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
Joseph Kardek
11W–39L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
Robert Greer
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Susie Williamson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45
Judy Theriault
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
Shashanna Singh
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
Rob Thomas
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Saurabh Shrivastava
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
Ramya Jayaraman
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
David Hsieh
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Rose Spicer
7W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Gregory de la Pena
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Julie Lassig
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Wendy Greer
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Odette Kardek
14W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
Jim Plewa
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
2.62
Francisco Marin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gregory Maroulas
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.