Teams

OLYMPIC CW6.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Rebecca Belding
published
3.86
Nora Bowers
published
3.66
Rachel Quon
published
3.32
Emily Simone
published 3.5
3.31
Elizabeth Griffiths
published 3.5
3.19
Anna Simmons
published 3.5
3.15
Kasey Quon
published
2.88
Nancy Economopoulos
published
2.76
Amanda Martial
published 3
2.64
Rachel Manson
published
2.62
Cornelia Weeks
published 3
2.60
Elizabeth Cooper
published 3
2.55
Gina Castagnola
published 3
2.26
Jaime Fox
published 3
Julie Christy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kasey Quon + Rachel Quon3355% games+5.3% vs expected
Amanda Martial + Cornelia Weeks123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Belding
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.99
Nora Bowers
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.86
Rachel Quon
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Emily Simone
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Elizabeth Griffiths
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Anna Simmons
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Kasey Quon
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Nancy Economopoulos
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Amanda Martial
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Rachel Manson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Cornelia Weeks
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Elizabeth Cooper
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.60
3
Gina Castagnola
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Jaime Fox
0W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.26
Julie Christy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.