Teams

Carrollwood - B. Kuntz

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.86 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesRaquel Pullaro vs Ashley Terry6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBecky Kuntz / Kelly Miller vs Devon Connell / Michele Curtin6-2, 6-2
2025-02-28vs TYCC Party at the Net - M. JamesWon 10
W#1 DoublesRaquel Pullaro / Becky Kuntz vs Molly James / Sarah Lindbeck6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesMarlene sokol / Vanessa Martinez vs Alyson Thomas / Hyo Han0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTamara Inauen vs Sonia Cecilia Slaven3-6, 4-6
2025-02-07vs Riverhills - C. CoyleWon 10
W#1 SinglesRaquel Pullaro vs Hedy Yuan Hou6-3, 6-1
2025-01-31vs Cheval - M. McClureLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Miller / Vanessa Martinez vs Katie Dietz / LAURA Martin Santana3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTamara Inauen vs Marisa McClure4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaroline Drago / Cecilia Fanning Mitchell vs Diana Castellanos / Dhara Patel3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesBecky Kuntz / Raquel Pullaro vs Cindy Eicholtz / Caro Massari6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRaquel Pullaro vs Catherine Kotson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Becky Kuntz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Jackie Botet
published 3
2.69
Raquel Pullaro
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Dru Albano
published 3
2.60
Claudia Chao
published 3
2.09
Marlene sokol
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.96
Elizabeth Hanley
published 2.5
1.75
Cecilia Fanning Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Tamara Inauen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Vanessa Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raquel Pullaro + Becky Kuntz7753% games+10.5% vs expected
Jackie Botet + Dru Albano314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Becky Kuntz
53W–62L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Jackie Botet
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Raquel Pullaro
72W–68L career · 9 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Dru Albano
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Claudia Chao
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Marlene sokol
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Elizabeth Hanley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
2.5
Cecilia Fanning Mitchell
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.75
Tamara Inauen
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Martinez
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.