Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/8.0/Jones/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 4.20 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Amy Orourke
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 4.5
4.20
Daniela Ibarra
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.84
Gibran Olmos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Cristina Munoz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 4
3.77
Austin Allen
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 4
Karla Nahomi Marroquin
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published
Luis Carbajal
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Luisa Pacheco
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Michael Kotowski
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Nathan Brown
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paulina Caraveo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Pedro Ibarra
usually #2 Singles 35%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Rene Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Valerie Santos
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #1 Singles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Kotowski + Nathan Brown31665% games+3.9% vs expected
Rene Herrera + Austin Allen28560% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Santos + Austin Allen6157% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Santos + Cristina Munoz4256% gamesnot enough data
Daniela Ibarra + Luis Carbajal4154% gamesnot enough data
Austin Allen + Cristina Munoz314 matchesnot enough data
Gibran Olmos + Valerie Santos303 matchesnot enough data
Austin Allen + Nathan Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Orourke
69W–33L career · 26 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Daniela Ibarra
70W–43L career · 17 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.20
4
Gibran Olmos
16W–0L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Cristina Munoz
33W–24L career · 23 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Austin Allen
152W–47L career · 31 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Karla Nahomi Marroquin
18W–8L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Carbajal
43W–20L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luisa Pacheco
23W–7L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Kotowski
130W–48L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Brown
59W–32L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paulina Caraveo
17W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pedro Ibarra
20W–10L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rene Herrera
49W–19L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Santos
129W–67L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.