← Teams

SAC-Boyce/Harwood

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Matt Zhou
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Shawn Boyce
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Anish Vidyarthi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Jeff Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Mubashir Cheema
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.14
Paul Harwood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Rajan Madhusudan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Joshua Tran
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Jonathan Lo
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.92
Donny Cablao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-07-24Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesShawn Boyce / Paul Harwood vs NANDA SIDDAIAH / Kirk Planck6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMubashir Cheema vs Page Watts6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonny Cablao / Matt Zhou vs Hoover Li / Harish Krishnamurthy3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJonathan Lo / Rajan Madhusudan vs Dale Christensen / Robert Truong7-6, 6-3
2021-07-18Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesShawn Boyce / Sheldon Sun vs Stefano Cavallucci / Christopher Robbins6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJonathan Lo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDonny Cablao / Rajan Madhusudan vs Ken Dragoon / Xavier Oberlander6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnish Vidyarthi / Joshua Tran vs John Nee / Chip Rosenfeld6-2, 6-1
2021-07-11Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesShawn Boyce / Jeff Wheeler vs John Wallin / Rolf Ellingsen6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMubashir Cheema vs Rick Raivio7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSheldon Sun / Joshua Tran vs John Hapke / Kimbal Logan5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatt Zhou / Jonathan Lo vs Hayward Reed / Andrew Huck4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-06-26Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesShawn Boyce / Michael Mosser - * vs Dan Tracy / Jason Hyde6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMubashir Cheema vs Troy Johnston4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJonathan Lo / Joshua Tran vs Greg Culver / David Bender6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeff Wheeler / Matt Zhou vs Brenner Daniels / Michael Cobb6-1, 6-1
2021-06-19Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesShawn Boyce / Mubashir Cheema vs Shane Kim / Michael Lee4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheldon Sun / Joshua Tran vs Kent Wall / Charlie Adams6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDonny Cablao / Jonathan Lo vs Chris Hasle / Jeremy Fields7-5, 6-1
2021-06-06Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesJeff Wheeler / Paul Harwood vs Paul Stutzman / Matt Thayer6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMubashir Cheema vs Janis Locenieks6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAnish Vidyarthi / Joshua Tran vs Piero Fenato / John Lekas6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatt Zhou / Rajan Madhusudan vs Richard Jennings / Skip Potter6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Matt Zhou
63W–65L career
0%73%27%
3.53
3.5
Shawn Boyce
170W–125L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Anish Vidyarthi
45W–42L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Jeff Wheeler
30W–51L career
4%96%1%
3.22
3.5
Mubashir Cheema
71W–74L career
3%97%0%
3.21
3.5
Paul Harwood
59W–69L career
14%85%1%
3.14
3.5
Rajan Madhusudan
94W–79L career
13%87%0%
3.09
3.5
Joshua Tran
42W–57L career
20%80%0%
3.05
3.5
Jonathan Lo
31W–59L career
37%63%0%
2.99
3
Donny Cablao
42W–50L career
0%85%15%
2.92

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.