Teams

MRTC THORNTON 7.0

2025 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weeknight 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-11vs Raintree Campbell 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKarl Jones / Herbert Dunnaville vs Stuart Dowdy / Shawkat Rana6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-06vs Avalon Jack - McKelveyWon 10
W#1 DoublesHerbert Dunnaville / Karl Jones vs Gregory Blouch / David McKelvey6-3, 7-5
2025-06-04vs MTC Still Got Game 7.0 - CookWon 10
W#1 DoublesHerbert Dunnaville / Karl Jones vs Jerry Yospin / Johnny Joyner6-1, 6-1
2025-05-07vs Avalon Team BlandLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Cutlip / Karl Jones vs James Melson / Mike Melson3-6, 0-6
2025-04-30vs Burkwood GoldenWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonald Hoover / Karl Jones vs John Bailey / Joe VANCE6-2, 7-5
2025-04-23vs ACAC McFadden 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesDonald Hoover / Karl Jones vs Joseph Cipolla / Steve Shannon6-0, 7-6
2025-04-16vs MTC Still Got Game 7.0 - CookSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonald Hoover / Bill James vs Johnny Joyner / Jeffrey Johnson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSpencer Carter / William Gray vs Eric Fielding / Doug Cook6-1, 7-6
2025-04-09vs TDC Prince 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBill James / Karl Jones vs Nelson Dawson / Paul DeLuca6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weeknight 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Karl Jones
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.16
Michael Huband
published
2.92
Bill James
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
William Cutlip
published
2.86
Spencer Carter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Edward Thornton
published
James Dugger
published
William Gray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Dugger + Bill James5451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karl Jones
144W–148L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Michael Huband
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Bill James
20W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
William Cutlip
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Spencer Carter
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Edward Thornton
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Dugger
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Gray
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.