Teams

FRIEDMAN - A.FARMS

2022 Loudoun Combo Women · Loudoun Women's 6.5 Combo League

13 players · average NTRP 3.56 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-20vs MARCOTTE - A. FarmsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJill Holloman / Niki Friedman vs Alexis Martin / Sharon DiRenzo2-6, 7-5
2022-09-16vs SCHINNER - Creighton FarmsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNiki Friedman / Michelle Tenhaeff vs Julia Moss / Marisa Zaneis6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTaylor Marr / Anne McDonald vs Gretchen Leitch / Rebecca McDonald6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristina Treacy / Cheryl Kasper vs Britney Beauchemin / Melanie Skinner6-0, 6-0
2022-09-13vs PLACE/ McMULLEN- BroadlandsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Graham / Jill Holloman vs Karen Ziff / Leanne Drake6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Collier / Michelle Tenhaeff vs Jerien Okoh-Tisch / Lynn Colavita6-2, 6-1
2022-08-30vs MARCOTTE - A. FarmsWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristiane Lavin / Taylor Marr vs Andrea Gevas / Holly Rasmussen6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Collier / Michelle Tenhaeff vs Jenny Gillespie / Stephanie Peebles4-6, 5-3
2022-08-23vs PLACE/ McMULLEN- BroadlandsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMichelle Tenhaeff / Elizabeth Young vs Yesim Temeemi / Mary Beth Williamson7-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJill Holloman / Lauren Malone vs Michelle Grande / Angela Hoffman6-2, 6-4
2022-08-09vs MARCOTTE - A. FarmsWon 20
W#1 DoublesTaylor Marr / Elizabeth Young vs Stephanie Bozarth / Kristin Satterfield6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Graham / Jill Holloman vs Annie Baba / Elizabeth Marcotte7-5, 6-1
2022-08-02vs PLACE/ McMULLEN- BroadlandsWon 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Malone / Christina Treacy vs Irma Rodriguez / Lisa Furgal6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Women's 6.5 Combo League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jill Holloman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Bethe Halpern
published 4
3.60
Elizabeth Young
published 3.5
3.51
Taylor Marr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Caroline Mia Lee
published 3.5
3.48
Christina Treacy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Michelle Tenhaeff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Julie Collier
published
3.05
Jennifer Graham
published
2.97
Lauren Malone
published
2.90
Niki Friedman
published
2.75
Anne McDonald
published 3
Tina Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Mia Lee + Jill Holloman14660% games+6.0% vs expected
Christina Treacy + Elizabeth Young5165% games+4.4% vs expected
Taylor Marr + Jill Holloman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jill Holloman
155W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Bethe Halpern
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Young
36W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Taylor Marr
132W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Caroline Mia Lee
46W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.50
3.5
Christina Treacy
79W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Michelle Tenhaeff
306W–196L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Julie Collier
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Graham
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Lauren Malone
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
Niki Friedman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Anne McDonald
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.75
Tina Woods
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.