Teams

RJHHeiser/River Run

2022-2023 Racquets & Jackets Doubles League · Women Division B (3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-02-15Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristina Tarry / Janet Szilagyi vs Stephanie Clancy / Filomena Ferri6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Reyerson / Beth Schleck vs Bethany Barber / Brenda Kadlecik2-6, 3-6
2023-02-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Gosling / Amy Reyerson vs Brooke Harris / Bridgette Ashbrook5-7, 2-6
2023-01-31vs RJSReitler/CabCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Reyerson / Carol Seeber vs Arlene Ireland / Kathy Dorr3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-18vs RJW-Fairer/NorthstoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Tarry / Sharon Kerns vs Wendy Fairer / Elizabeth Mangano6-1, 6-2
2023-01-13vs RJTUtz/River RunWon 20
W#1 DoublesSharon Kerns / Christina Tarry vs Phebby Benton / Patricia Sharawy6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBeth Schleck / Natalie Van Epps vs Kelly Grathwohl / Brooke Harris6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-11vs RJSMcAfee-Griffin/JettonWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Kerns / Christina Tarry vs Suzun McCrary / Jenny Yaudes6-1
2022-12-20vs RJSReitler/CabCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Szilagyi / Christina Tarry vs Patty Smith / LuAnne Pate1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-12-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNatalie Van Epps / Beth Schleck vs Denise Takes / Katherine Karnatz2-6, 5-7
2022-12-12vs RJW-Fairer/NorthstoneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPamela Zamora / Christina Tarry vs Lori Gougeon / Elizabeth Mangano6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Schleck / Amy Reyerson vs Terri Merklein / Victoria Ciucci5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesNatalie Van Epps / Amy Reyerson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Division B (3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Janet Szilagyi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Sharon Kerns
published
3.58
Christina Tarry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Pamela Zamora
published
3.37
Natalie Van Epps
published
3.34
Dawn Bush
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Debbie Noe
published 3.5
3.18
Heather Heiser
published 3.5
3.10
Megan McKinley
published
3.09
Lisa Gosling
published
3.04
Beth Schleck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Joanne Cunningham
published
2.93
Teresa Meletiou
published
2.90
Amy Reyerson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lydia Dayton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Szilagyi + Christina Tarry13259% games+4.3% vs expected
Sharon Kerns + Christina Tarry224 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Van Epps + Beth Schleck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Sharon Kerns
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Christina Tarry
60W–39L career · 6 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Pamela Zamora
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.56
Natalie Van Epps
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Dawn Bush
50W–40L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Debbie Noe
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Heather Heiser
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Megan McKinley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Lisa Gosling
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Beth Schleck
92W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Joanne Cunningham
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Teresa Meletiou
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Amy Reyerson
35W–33L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
Lydia Dayton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.