Teams

A18 3.5M LT Garst

2024 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA A18&O 3.5 Men Spring

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-05vs A18 3.5M PM DavisLost 12
W#1 DoublesLee Sulzener / William Kenyhercz vs Andy Brouse / Bill Balzarini6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSHENGYONG WANG vs John Liebler6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Quist / Max Roszkowski vs Craig Welsh / Jonathan Glazer6-7, 3-6
2024-03-22vs A18 3.5M CC GanimSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWilliam Kenyhercz / Lee Sulzener vs Evan Kuczynski / Kevin Day3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNEIL MCHALE / Brian Vaught vs Slawomir Baldyga / Mateus David4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-15vs A18 3.5M NC2 JohnstonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Sulzener / William Kenyhercz vs Larry Kistler / Rex Degler4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Quist / Max Roszkowski vs Jaime Unklesby / Clayton Cundiff6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-08vs A18 3.5M NC1 BooherWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Suddeth / Lee Sulzener vs Michael Kramer / Benjamin Bartholomew6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesWilliam Kenyhercz vs Allan Lynch6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Quist / NEIL MCHALE vs Dave Immel / Timothy Booher6-1, 6-1
2024-02-23vs A18 3.5M CC GanimWon 21
W#1 DoublesLee Sulzener / Rob Rericha vs Jason Ganim / Andrew Biegacki7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSHENGYONG WANG vs Slawomir Baldyga3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMax Roszkowski / William Kenyhercz vs Paul Yu / Brian Razum6-3, 7-6
2024-02-09vs A18 3.5M PM DavisWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Garst / Lee Sulzener vs Jonathan Glazer / James McCans4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSHENGYONG WANG vs John Liebler6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Quist / Max Roszkowski vs Michael Nickley / Sayyad Bajee Sheik6-1, 6-2
2024-02-02vs A18 3.5M NC2 JohnstonLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Garst / Jeff Sterling vs Matthew Johnston / David Stucki7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMax Roszkowski vs Jaime Unklesby1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Gehring / Brian Suddeth vs Clayton Cundiff / Larry Kistler3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · NEOTA A18&O 3.5 Men Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 3.5M WE Elefter8222817198
2A18 3.5M WR2 Downing82201025233
3A18 3.5M MV2 Nine82181229236
4A18 3.5M MM3 Viswanathan6217716166
5A18 3.5M MM1 Kumar6216818176
6A18 3.5M CC Ganim6216822201
7A18 3.5M NC2 Johnston6215924202
8A18 3.5M MM2 Pundir44111330238
9A18 3.5M NC1 Booher35121226197
10A18 3.5M AO Schelzig35111328214
11A18 3.5M LT Garst35101432246
12A18 3.5M MV1 Haught37151533273
13A18 3.5M WR3 Sharma37111941286
14A18 3.5M PM Davis2671735250
15A18 3.5M FRR Mellino1751939272
16A18 3.5M WR1 Ciborek01042655346

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Brian Suddeth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Lee Sulzener
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.30
Steve Gehring
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
William Kenyhercz
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.25
NEIL MCHALE
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
SHENGYONG WANG
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Brian Vaught
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Max Roszkowski
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Ryan Garst
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.09
Jeff Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Rob Rericha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Chris Thompson
published 3.5
David Quist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Sterling + Lee Sulzener17461% games+3.0% vs expected
Steve Gehring + Rob Rericha8459% games+0.7% vs expected
Rob Rericha + Brian Suddeth8356% games−3.1% vs expected
Jeff Sterling + Chris Thompson8950% games−4.0% vs expected
NEIL MCHALE + Steve Gehring7353% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Sterling + Ryan Garst4447% gamesnot enough data
Rob Rericha + Ryan Garst2441% gamesnot enough data
Steve Gehring + Ryan Garst2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Suddeth
69W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
Lee Sulzener
76W–53L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
Steve Gehring
95W–54L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
William Kenyhercz
21W–15L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
NEIL MCHALE
63W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
SHENGYONG WANG
27W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Brian Vaught
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Max Roszkowski
38W–34L career · 12 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.15
Ryan Garst
120W–100L career · 5 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jeff Sterling
72W–47L career · 1 line in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Rob Rericha
40W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Chris Thompson
35W–46L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
David Quist
70W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.