Teams

PENINSULA GCC 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesJJ Elliott / Stephanie Chu vs Daphne Zenk / Jennifer Yang1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKirsten Clarke / Patricia Hunter vs Angela Lam / Jenny Huynh4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesPatricia Hunter / Sally Jones vs Daphne Zenk / Hannah Kim2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAbra Stein vs Jing Gu2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Bromberg / Yvonne Roth vs Elaine Yang / Natalie Wong4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIsa Kravitz / Susan Ryan vs Monica Reid / Jenny Huynh2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesPatricia Hunter / Jacquelyn Hsu vs Su-Mien Chong / Tiffany Truong6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJoyce Huynh vs Elaine Yang6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaige Cattano / Rima Khalil vs Angela Lam / Jenny Huynh3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAbra Stein vs Natalie Wong5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHeidi Krakovsky / Laura Miller vs Hannah Kim / Jing Gu1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Sara Weaver
published
3.39
Jen Keane
published
3.37
Danielle Bromberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Tara Verner
published
3.16
Paige Cattano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Patricia Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Abra Stein
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.05
Kirsten Clarke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Jacquelyn Hsu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Isa Kravitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Rima Khalil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Courtney Nicoletti
published 3.5
2.91
Beth Rogers
published 3
2.89
JJ Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Beatrice Murphy
published 3
2.85
Heidi Krakovsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Stephanie Chu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Paige Austin
published
2.72
Yvonne Roth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Christina Pietro
published 3
Joyce Huynh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beatrice Murphy + Beth Rogers6161% gamesnot enough data
Rima Khalil + Patricia Hunter224 matchesnot enough data
Jacquelyn Hsu + Jen Keane123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Weaver
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jen Keane
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Danielle Bromberg
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Tara Verner
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Paige Cattano
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Patricia Hunter
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Abra Stein
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Kirsten Clarke
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Jacquelyn Hsu
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Isa Kravitz
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Rima Khalil
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Courtney Nicoletti
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Beth Rogers
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
JJ Elliott
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Beatrice Murphy
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Heidi Krakovsky
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.85
Stephanie Chu
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Paige Austin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.73
Yvonne Roth
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Christina Pietro
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Joyce Huynh
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.