Teams

WH Mahaney SSL A18-3.5W

2024 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 3.5 W (7 player)

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-24vs PA Hendrickson SSL A18-3.5WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesROSEANN BLAHNIK / Therese Miller vs Cherrah Casserly / Cara Dykstra6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChristine Mahaney vs Sommer Dockery4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly KIngsbury Curvelo / Margaret Cancro vs Margaret Greydanus / Julie Quist6-3, 1-5
W#3 DoublesChristine Douma / Jana Schulman vs Kate MacGuidwin / Natasha Merkle6-1, 6-3
2024-05-03vs PA Vinoski SSL A18-3.5WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKimberly KIngsbury Curvelo / Lori Green vs Jill Farran-Andrade / Karen Sterzick6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChristine Mahaney vs Samantha DeYoung2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Cancro / ROSEANN BLAHNIK vs Ruth Kohley / Mary Burdo6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Clement / Astrid Goldenbeld vs Deb Vis / Volita Vinoski3-6, 1-6
2024-04-26vs MVC Tsutsumi Buckhold SSL A18-3.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Mahaney / ROSEANN BLAHNIK vs Michelle Madden / Beth Balon6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly KIngsbury Curvelo / Lisa Barr vs Cynthia Swain / Cindy Vander Ploeg4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJana Schulman / Astrid Goldenbeld vs Susan Weiss / Lin Vermeulen4-6, 2-6
2024-02-02vs PY Harris SSL A18-3.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesLori Green / Ginger Owen vs Leigh Garrison / Jessica McConnell6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJulie Benes vs Rebecca Durant3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Mahaney / Therese Miller vs Carmen Harris / Linda Scannell2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Clement / Jana Schulman vs Becky Bach / Dana Cunningham0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A18&O 3.5 W (7 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Christine Mahaney
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Therese Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Lisa Barr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
ROSEANN BLAHNIK
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.80
Julie Benes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Jana Schulman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Margaret Cancro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.65
Anna Clement
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Ginger Owen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
2.58
Christine Douma
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.52
Astrid Goldenbeld
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lori Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ROSEANN BLAHNIK + Lisa Barr5164% games+10.0% vs expected
Anna Clement + Margaret Cancro5161% games+9.0% vs expected
Christine Douma + Margaret Cancro3256% games+5.9% vs expected
ROSEANN BLAHNIK + Therese Miller6357% games+5.2% vs expected
Astrid Goldenbeld + Therese Miller5354% games+3.8% vs expected
Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo + ROSEANN BLAHNIK151450% games+2.9% vs expected
Christine Mahaney + ROSEANN BLAHNIK4548% games+2.8% vs expected
Ginger Owen + Therese Miller3745% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Mahaney
43W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo
48W–61L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
Therese Miller
83W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lisa Barr
25W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
ROSEANN BLAHNIK
96W–75L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Julie Benes
27W–33L career · 1 line in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.80
Jana Schulman
21W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
Margaret Cancro
42W–74L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Anna Clement
22W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Ginger Owen
46W–68L career · 6 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
2.60
3
Christine Douma
52W–95L career · 11 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
2.58
3
Astrid Goldenbeld
58W–106L career · 6 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Lori Green
28W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.