Teams

Fabros-Beuchat 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.5 Women Fall Singles

6 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-06vs Keaney 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesSuki Gutierrez vs Alexa Smith1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesPaula Gebhard vs Allison Aldridge6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJennifer Angelada vs Cackie Marsh1-6, 1-6
2025-09-22vs Dagger 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesPam Fabros-Beuchat vs Rosa Phillips6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKari Eddington vs Sandy Cathers6-1, 6-1
2025-09-15vs Keaney 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesPaula Gebhard vs Emily Mack1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRosemarie Palazzolo vs Laura Coleman3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSuki Gutierrez vs Stephanie Renn6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-25vs Dagger 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesKari Eddington vs Rebekah East6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPam Fabros-Beuchat vs Rosa Phillips6-1, 7-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Angelada vs Ashlyn Wilson2-6, 0-6
2025-08-18vs Keaney 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesPam Fabros-Beuchat vs Emily Mack6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesPaula Gebhard vs Alexa Smith5-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Angelada vs Stephanie Renn1-6, 0-6
2025-08-04vs Dagger 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMWon 21
L#1 SinglesRosemarie Palazzolo vs Rosa Phillips5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSuki Gutierrez vs Courtney Dagger6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesKari Eddington vs Sandy Cathers6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Kari Eddington
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.16
Pam Fabros-Beuchat
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.08
Paula Gebhard
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.98
Rosemarie Palazzolo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.88
Suki Gutierrez
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
Jennifer Angelada
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kari Eddington
26W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Pam Fabros-Beuchat
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Paula Gebhard
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Rosemarie Palazzolo
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Suki Gutierrez
32W–43L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jennifer Angelada
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.