Teams

JByrd-CAP 4.0

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Singles League · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-04vs LinhNguyenSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Aaron Heil3-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Gordon Paulson6-3, 7-5
2022-07-20Won 20
W#1 SinglesRyan Berliner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMatthew James vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Andrew Cole6-2, 6-0
2022-07-12vs RSheppardWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Hunter Heinbach6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Jack Hu4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-02vs MRoachWon 10
W#3 SinglesMatthew James vs Edward Maginnis6-1, 6-1
2022-06-16vs CMinsleyWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Seb Heese6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Charles George6-1, 6-2
2022-06-09vs SWingo7OakSinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Matt Shait3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMatthew James vs Barrett Rankin6-2, 6-3
2022-06-02Won 10
W#3 SinglesRyan Berliner vs Robert Lockard6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Brett Eckles
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Tyler Carroll
published
4.28
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Matthew James
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.95
Craig Radley
published 4
3.75
Ryan Berliner
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.57
Randy Poteat
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Spencer Llewellyn + Ryan Berliner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
Tyler Carroll
29W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
231W–157L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Matthew James
67W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · 2 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Craig Radley
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Ryan Berliner
113W–104L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Randy Poteat
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.