Teams

PPaharia/DJohnson (Jeff Adams)

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-03vs PKartes/RMaddle (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesPete Eakin / Omar Punjabi vs Randall Maddle / James Smith6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPrakhar Paharia / David Shevsky vs Michal Jarzynski / Will Gardner6-4, 1-1
2024-06-27Won 20
W#1 DoublesOmar Punjabi / Pete Eakin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPrakhar Paharia / David Shevsky vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-13vs DPazo/Marks (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDuane Johnson / Omar Punjabi vs Mark Utyesonich / Kartik Mahalingam4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-06vs RAllen/PGibson (Life Time)Won 10
W#3 DoublesPrakhar Paharia / David Shevsky vs Sunil Mehta / Biju Nair6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Guilherme Dumit
published
4.26
Pete Eakin
published
4.23
Sahil Vasa
published
4.23
Omar Punjabi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Alexander Brandt
published 4.5
3.98
Jarrett Meadors
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.96
Prakhar Paharia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
David Shevsky
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.52
Xuezhi Tang
usually #2 Doubles 82%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Shevsky + Prakhar Paharia303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Guilherme Dumit
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.39
Pete Eakin
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
Sahil Vasa
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Omar Punjabi
66W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Alexander Brandt
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.16
4
Jarrett Meadors
70W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Prakhar Paharia
189W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
3.5
David Shevsky
118W–37L career · type A · 10 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.69
3.5
Xuezhi Tang
64W–42L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.