Teams

HHTL55/Risk/South Beach

Adult 55 & Over - USTA · Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-24vs HHTL55/Sweeney/PRRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Risk / William Gardner vs Albert Day / Bradley Nicklin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDan Carey / Jake Gartner vs Scott Camp / Chris Keenan6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMark White / Scott Sanniota vs David Johnson / Howard Freilich6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-10vs HHTL (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Tupper)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam Gardner / Robert Risk vs Russ Roberts / Chuck Timilty5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJake Gartner / David Jones vs Joe Kleinhenz / Mike McVey1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRussell Patterson / David Wellinghoff vs Wendell Anderson / Jonathan Bowdler0-6, 0-6
2026-03-03vs HHTL55/Sweeney/PRRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam Gardner / Robert Risk vs Albert Day / Chris Hall3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJake Gartner / Mark White vs Carl Baker / Bradley Osborne2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Jones / Joe Short vs David Johnson / David Myers5-7, 5-7
2026-02-17vs HHTL (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Tupper)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Jones / Dan Carey vs Gerald Helbig / Paul Sedlacek2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Gardner / Jake Gartner vs Mike McVey / Joe Kleinhenz3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEric Piscini / Mark White vs Wendell Anderson / Chuck Timilty1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-10vs HHTL55/Sweeney/PRRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDan Carey / David Jones vs Bradley Nicklin / James Diaz7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJake Gartner / Mark White vs Albert Day / Tim Wolf3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Gardner / Robert Risk vs Michael Delaney / Howard Freilich6-3, 6-0
2025-04-05vs HHTL55/Sweeney/PRRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Gardner / Robert Risk vs Albert Day / Jonathan Bowdler6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRussell Patterson / Zach Patterson vs David Shelp / Paul Sedlacek0-6, 3-6
2025-03-19vs HHTL55/Sweeney/PRRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric Piscini / Jake Gartner vs Randy Beavers / Andrew Camacho6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWilliam Gardner / Robert Risk vs Carl Baker / Albert Day3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRussell Patterson / Joe Short vs Joel Buxton / Jonathan Bowdler0-6, 2-6
2025-02-22vs HHTL55/Sweeney/PRRCLost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Gardner / Robert Risk vs Scott Camp / Bradley Osborne6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJake Gartner / Eric Piscini vs Albert Day / Tim Wolf2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSam Carucci / Rick Moore vs Gerald Helbig / David Shelp2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jake Gartner
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.81
Robert Risk
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.74
Dan Carey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Eric Piscini
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
William Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Scott Sanniota
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Mark White
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Sam Carucci
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
David Wellinghoff
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Russell Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Joe Short
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Short + Russell Patterson2939% games+0.7% vs expected
Robert Risk + William Gardner8655% games−5.3% vs expected
Eric Piscini + Jake Gartner314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jake Gartner
14W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Robert Risk
23W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Dan Carey
2W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Eric Piscini
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
William Gardner
36W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Scott Sanniota
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Mark White
10W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
Sam Carucci
24W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
David Wellinghoff
38W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Russell Patterson
9W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Joe Short
20W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.