Teams

Kovaleski/LR/Reb

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-28vs Korkames/FS/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesDoug Meyer / Stephen Guffey vs Bill Coleman / Larry Schwartz6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesFrancis Hartz / Byron Curtner vs Richard Falkner / Anthony Kovacevic5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Kovaleski / Marc Sherman vs Joseph Korkames / Douglas Walt6-4, 6-3
2024-09-28vs Norby/Meyer/HSV/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Guffey / Stephen Rowell vs Madison Pope / Gary Strakshus3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Lee / Daniel Rist vs Randy Bruno / Douglas Hicks6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Cloud / Fred Brown vs Ken Jeffries / Bill Norby5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-27vs Magee/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesFred Brown / John Cloud vs Karl Kohler / Robert Gleason5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFrancis Hartz / Byron Curtner vs Vernon Wade / Glenn Grossman7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarc Sherman / Doug Meyer vs Dana Bennett / Jim Goss6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Fred Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Robert Porbeck
published
3.12
Francis Hartz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Doug Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.74
John Cloud
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Byron Curtner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Rist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Guffey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Rowell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Kovaleski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Meyer + Robert Porbeck3242% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Rowell + Robert Porbeck314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Fred Brown
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
Robert Porbeck
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Francis Hartz
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Doug Meyer
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
John Cloud
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Byron Curtner
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Daniel Rist
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Marc Sherman
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Guffey
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Rowell
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Kovaleski
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.