Teams

Julich

2023 18&Over Women Manhattan · Open Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.88 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-29vs GlickWon 30
W#1 DoublesSophia Kryloff / Alexandra Fields vs Cara Kizilbash / Melina Stavropoulos6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLena Arafa vs Sarah Frendo6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnnie Sullivan / Courtney Dawson vs Jacqueline Clark / Robin Lieberman6-0, 6-3
2023-06-19vs GlickLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaitlyn Frankel / Priyanka Shah vs Jane Stewart / Nisha Suda6-4, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCampbell Cooper / Lauren Amos vs Robin Lieberman / Chiara Ciabatti6-7, 4-6
2023-06-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesSophia Kryloff vs Cara Kizilbash6-2, 6-0
2023-06-05vs GlickLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaitlyn Frankel / Campbell Cooper vs Shinann Featherston / Elena Blanina1-6, 1-6
2023-05-30vs GlickLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Lessen / Sophia Kryloff vs Sanae Oyama Diller / Chiara Ciabatti1-6, 2-6
2023-05-24vs GlickLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllegra Hanlon / Priyanka Shah vs Shinann Featherston / Elena Skomorovsky0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCampbell Cooper vs Jane Stewart0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCaitlyn Frankel / Alexandra Fields vs Cara Kizilbash / Melina Stavropoulos6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Open Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Glick0610716132
2Julich0661124169

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Annie Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Caitlyn Frankel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
Campbell Cooper
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.45
Sophia Kryloff
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.38
Priyanka Shah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.31
Lena Arafa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.99
Ashley Lessen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Ria Gerger
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Annie Sullivan
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
5
Caitlyn Frankel
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Campbell Cooper
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sophia Kryloff
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.45
Priyanka Shah
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.38
Lena Arafa
32W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Ashley Lessen
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.99
Ria Gerger
28W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.