← Teams

SJRC-Lee

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Rachel Novak
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.55
Cathleen Lang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Michelle Zawadzki
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.31
Julie LaMontagne
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
—
Lia Irvin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Colleen Walker
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
2.84
Karen Kraus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results13 ties
2021-08-28Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Zawadzki vs Anna Graves6-2, 6-3
2021-08-27Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Zawadzki vs Jennifer Huebner6-0, 0-6, 1-0
2021-08-01Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Zawadzki vs Betty Roux6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-07-31Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Zawadzki vs Katie Jurgenson6-4, 6-1
2021-05-16Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesPage Watts / Rachel Novak vs Brenna Dramov / Devin McMasters6-1, 6-2
2021-05-15Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesStefano Cavallucci / Rachel Novak vs Michele Sutherland / Jason Moore-Greenke6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2021-04-30Won 5–0
W#1 DoublesElise D Harvey / Cathleen Lang vs Crystal Miller / Seona Zimmermann3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Helen Chen6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesColleen Walker / Michelle Zawadzki vs Jennifer Fei / Sibyl Jarrett6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Abbie Hover6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Kraus / Janet Lee vs Jeny Joseph / Susan Rolfe0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-24Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesJessica Bue / Julie LaMontagne vs Shella Razon-Lumetta / Autumn Gray6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Sharon Mathew7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Zawadzki / Colleen Walker vs Chrys Culver / Chanon Ogden6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElise D Harvey / Karen Kraus vs Donna Walker / Tarynn Berkman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-17Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRachel Novak / Lia Irvin vs Angie Stromquist / Suzanne Chambers6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJanet Lee / Cathleen Lang vs Inge Marshall / Michelle Johnson6-3, 5-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Kraus / Michelle Zawadzki vs May Graham / Miriam Habafy4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-04-11Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesLia Irvin / Janet Lee vs Cheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Caroline Johnson6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichelle Zawadzki / Colleen Walker vs Heidi Kjos / Angela Benedict6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Bue / Karen Kraus vs Tamara Phillips / Brooke Henderson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-04Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesElise D Harvey / Colleen Walker vs Heike Droste / Crystal Miller6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLia Irvin vs Abbie Hover1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Novak / Julie LaMontagne vs Aleli Siruno / Helen Chen7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Lee / Karen Kraus vs Debbie Spitzer / Patty Chen6-1, 6-3
2021-03-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJanet Lee / Rachel Novak vs Laura Laney / Peg McClendon6-3, 5-4
L#2 DoublesJulie LaMontagne / Colleen Walker vs Susie Jansky / Mary Murphy6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCathleen Lang / Elise D Harvey vs Alison Davis / Nancy Williams6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2021-03-05Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMatt Deems / Lia Irvin vs Alex McIntosh / Gabriela McIntosh6-7, 5-4
L#2 DoublesSebastian Llados Vila / Cathleen Lang vs WILLIAM FANG / Leah Buxman2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Rachel Novak
71W–39L career
1%98%0%
3.73
3.5
Cathleen Lang
67W–68L career
0%68%32%
3.55
3.5
Michelle Zawadzki
74W–33L career
0%81%19%
3.48
3.5
Julie LaMontagne
85W–69L career
0%99%1%
3.31
3.5
Lia Irvin
63W–43L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Colleen Walker
58W–78L career
9%91%0%
3.14
3
Karen Kraus
79W–102L career
0%97%2%
2.84

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.