Teams

Stursma/Bella Vista

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-27vs Venable/MHWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslie Jones / Tammy Waddell vs Terry Wood / Phyllis Venable6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarsha Taylor / Maggie Griesse vs Nancy Decker / Linda Robertson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Borden / Pamela Larimer vs Donna Hoffmann / Tina Gibson6-2, 6-3
2025-09-27vs Oulette/SherwoodWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Schrader / Mimi Sharpe vs Belinda Brolo / Anne Hawkins6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarsha Taylor / Maggie Griesse vs Joy Liaw / Lissa Symancyk6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVickie Adkins / Sandy Stursma vs Kelly Oulette / Dena Wenzler6-3, 6-2
2025-09-26vs Ward/ArkadelphiaWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslie Jones / Christine Borden vs Toni Harris / Susan Barron6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMaggie Griesse / Marsha Taylor vs Kim Ward / Terry Hagood6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMimi Sharpe / Anne Schrader vs Rita Stokes / Robin Terry6-1, 6-2
2025-09-26vs Roehrenbeck/LRWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Stursma / Vickie Adkins vs Leigh Wendlandt / Dee Healy6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarsha Taylor / Pamela Larimer vs Diane Bischof / Joy Wolf6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMimi Sharpe / Anne Schrader vs Carolyn Bakalekos / Bonnie Hartz4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Sandy Stursma
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Pamela Larimer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Anne Schrader
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Marsha Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Vickie Adkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Mimi Sharpe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Christine Borden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Tammy Waddell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maggie Griesse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Stursma + Vickie Adkins6063% games+6.5% vs expected
Vickie Adkins + Marsha Taylor8168% gamesnot enough data
Mimi Sharpe + Anne Schrader213 matchesnot enough data
Marsha Taylor + Maggie Griesse303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy Stursma
22W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Pamela Larimer
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Anne Schrader
7W–6L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Marsha Taylor
28W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Vickie Adkins
32W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Mimi Sharpe
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Christine Borden
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Tammy Waddell
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Maggie Griesse
17W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.