Teams

1-JMontague-CCC

2023 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-10vs 4-TMiller-CHCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Tom Porter6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Rick Edmunds vs Aaron Meadows / Doug Holroyd6-1, 6-1
2023-05-03vs 3-MAlimohammadi-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Alex Stoffregen6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRick Edmunds / Stephen Arrowood vs Steven Burger / Hsuan Kai Huang6-2, 6-3
2023-04-26vs 4-TMiller-CHCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Jeff Biersach6-1, 6-2
2023-04-19vs 5-MBLAND-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesRick Edmunds / Chuck Clark vs David Gilliam / Charles Fisher6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs John Hess6-1, 6-3
2023-04-12vs 6-MLong-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephen Arrowood / Rick Edmunds vs Russell Davis / Ryan Soles6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs John Chiles6-4, 6-1
2023-04-05vs 2-KBuckel-ElmiraWon 10
W#2 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Michael Andre6-4, 6-2
2023-03-29vs 3-MAlimohammadi-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Stewart / Rick Edmunds vs James Lambert / Trevor Noon1-6, 2-6
2023-03-22vs 6-MLong-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Kevin Winn6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Riedel / Rick Edmunds vs Terrence Hawkins / Alex Kappus6-3, 6-3
2023-03-01vs 2-KBuckel-ElmiraSplit 11
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Michael Andre6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRick Edmunds / Ryan Stewart vs Matt Carter / Matthew Feldt4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Schumann
published 4
3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
published
3.33
Arash Chehrazi
usually #1 Singles 58%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.03
Rick Edmunds
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.88
Robert Long
published
2.83
2.76
Travis Angle
published
Brent Fox
published 3
2.70
Mark Rhoades
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Long + Rick Edmunds3545% games−0.9% vs expected
Christopher LeGrand + Mark Rhoades224 matchesnot enough data
Rick Edmunds + Arash Chehrazi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Arash Chehrazi
87W–56L career · 12 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3
Rick Edmunds
76W–92L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.03
Robert Long
13W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Christopher LeGrand
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Travis Angle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brent Fox
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Rhoades
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.