Teams

Gilreath/GCC

2023 Fun Fall 39 & over-UPTA · 3.0 Women FF

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brittany Bolemon
published 3.5
3.17
Laura Whitney
published
3.12
Kate Gilreath
published
3.09
Shely Landrum
published
2.99
Sherwood Cobb
published
2.90
Ann Ellison
published 3.5
2.83
Deana Blanding
published 3
2.75
Katherine Mattice
published
Erin Horsley
published 3
2.70
Emily Busby
published 3
2.69
Leslie Ingram
published
2.68
Katie Phipps
published
2.65
Susanne Norwood
published
Nancy Theodore
published
Tiffany Boggs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susanne Norwood + Katherine Mattice0636% games−8.3% vs expected
Sherwood Cobb + Ann Ellison1537% games−8.9% vs expected
Shely Landrum + Kate Gilreath123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brittany Bolemon
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Whitney
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Kate Gilreath
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Shely Landrum
25W–25L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sherwood Cobb
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
3.5
Ann Ellison
19W–29L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Deana Blanding
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
Katherine Mattice
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Erin Horsley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Emily Busby
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Leslie Ingram
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Katie Phipps
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
Susanne Norwood
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Nancy Theodore
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tiffany Boggs
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.