Teams

Jeansonne/18/Bocage

2022 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 BR (18&O) Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.57 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 BR (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jeansonne/18/Bocage7131925287
2Kozar/18/UCLUB71291125259
3Bordelon/ 18/BREC62241634308
4Moody/18/BREC53221845394
5Labbe/18/BREC35162457386
6Bogan/18/BRCC35132763416
7Sellers/18/CCL26182251377
8Johnson/18/ YMCA26162456405
9Loupe/18/Bocage17112963433

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Joni Rigby
published
Diana Roman
published 4
3.54
3.36
Sharon Dileo
published
3.33
Heidi Smith
published 3.5
3.32
Mary Ashley Frey
published
3.29
Stacy Hebert
published
3.29
Lindsay Jeansonne
published
3.23
Anna Kronenberger
published 3.5
3.21
MaryClaire Hotard
published
3.21
3.19
Lesley Halphen
published
3.18
Kelli Guillot
published
3.17
Angela Montalbano
published 3.5
3.00
Donna St Cyr
published 3
2.96
Adrienne Taylor
published 3.5
Lisa Bosse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Kronenberger + Angela Montalbano4548% games+1.0% vs expected
Heidi Smith + Stacy Hebert11853% games−2.8% vs expected
Heidi Smith + Lindsay Jeansonne5068% gamesnot enough data
Anna Kronenberger + Sharon Dileo3255% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Hebert + Angela Montalbano213 matchesnot enough data
Lesley Halphen + Colleen Schneller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joni Rigby
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Diana Roman
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Colleen Schneller
28W–21L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Sharon Dileo
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Heidi Smith
26W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Mary Ashley Frey
46W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Stacy Hebert
19W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Lindsay Jeansonne
21W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Anna Kronenberger
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
MaryClaire Hotard
42W–44L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Patricia Brignac Talbot
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Lesley Halphen
27W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Kelli Guillot
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Angela Montalbano
8W–17L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Donna St Cyr
29W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
3.5
Adrienne Taylor
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Lisa Bosse
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.