Teams

2-GMatera - HR

2022 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-18vs 4-JClough-DFCWon 10
W#3 DoublesKyle Couch / William Lillard vs Edward Anderson / Jason Liss2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-15vs 3-Blackburn - CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarl Rist / William Lillard vs Scott Benson / Michael Meltsner1-6, 4-6
2022-08-30vs 1-CSchauman40 8.5 - EnoWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Easthom / Greg Matera vs Mickey Plowden / Craig Schauman7-5, 6-3
2022-08-28vs 3-Blackburn - CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesJames Easthom / Tom Sparks vs Sravan Narayan / Chris Combs3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesErik J Erikson / William Lillard vs Boyd Blackburn / Reed Breneman1-6, 3-6
2022-08-16vs 4-JClough-DFCWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatt Piland / William Lillard vs Jeff Francki / Nick Buchler4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-08-09vs 1-CSchauman40 8.5 - EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Easthom / Todd Hill vs Jason Abhau / Tony Stewart4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Hoekstra / William Lillard vs Richard McClenny / Craig Schauman0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Erik J Erikson
published 4.5
4.20
James Easthom
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
David Slack
published 4.5
3.99
Kyle Couch
published
3.95
Matt Piland
published
Greg Matera
published 4
3.53
William Lillard
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Carl Rist
published
Mike Hoekstra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Slack + James Easthom213 matchesnot enough data
Matt Piland + Kyle Couch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erik J Erikson
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
James Easthom
56W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
David Slack
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.10
Kyle Couch
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.99
Matt Piland
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Greg Matera
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
William Lillard
51W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
Carl Rist
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Hoekstra
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.