Teams

Parke - Stone Creek Man/Cov

2022 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.38 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Daysi Valencia
published 3.5
3.40
Jamie McWilliams
published 3.5
3.19
Cherie Verdigets
published 3.5
2.93
Alison Beebe
published 3
Janel Gray
published
Janel Tedesco
published
Jennifer Magness
published
Jolie McCaleb
published
Kelly Slimming
published
Kim Osborn
published
Kimberly Darr
published
Melinda Carmeli
published
Melissa Biggs
published
Monique Thornton
published
Pamela Schroeder
published
Sally Dane Sperry
published
Suzanne Parke
published
Tracy Pourciau
published
Trisha Rovira
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Darr + Alison Beebe11657% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Schroeder + Kim Osborn51049% gamesnot enough data
Jolie McCaleb + Kim Osborn6072% gamesnot enough data
Daysi Valencia + Kimberly Darr6063% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Parke + Tracy Pourciau1437% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Pourciau + Melissa Biggs3255% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Darr + Kelly Slimming2346% gamesnot enough data
Janel Gray + Melissa Biggs134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daysi Valencia
61W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Jamie McWilliams
33W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Cherie Verdigets
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Alison Beebe
64W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
Janel Gray
2W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janel Tedesco
19W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Magness
8W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jolie McCaleb
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
47W–42L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Osborn
28W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Darr
53W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda Carmeli
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Biggs
16W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Monique Thornton
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Schroeder
7W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sally Dane Sperry
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Parke
5W–32L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Pourciau
47W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Trisha Rovira
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.