Teams

Get a Grip

2024 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

9 players · average NTRP 3.31 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-05vs Can't, Got TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarilyn Ludt / Dina Pisani vs Margot Gilna / Kathne Morrell2-6, 0-6
2024-08-22vs Swing SistersLost 01
L#3 DoublesDina Pisani / Trang Pham vs Janna Tipton / Leanne Town1-6, 2-6
2024-08-20vs Can't, Got TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesDina Pisani / Hitomi Saheki vs Margot Gilna / Kathne Morrell2-6, 0-6
2024-08-15vs Doubles or Nothin’Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Fletcher / Dina Pisani vs Kathy Miller / Susan Myers6-7, 0-6
2024-08-08vs Can't, Got TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesDina Pisani / Teresa Thonney vs Rosa Carnot / Shauna Williams1-6, 5-7
2024-08-06vs Doubles or Nothin’Won 10
W#1 DoublesDina Pisani / Laura Fletcher vs Elaine Remley / Susan Myers6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Terry Hardy
published 4
3.39
Debbie Davies
published 3.5
3.38
Trang Pham
published 3.5
Angela Kris
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
2.83
Marilyn Ludt
published 3
2.82
Hitomi Saheki
published 3
2.80
Laura Fletcher
published 3
2.67
Teresa Thonney
published 3
Dina Pisani
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hitomi Saheki + Laura Fletcher8651% games+2.5% vs expected
Debbie Davies + Angela Kris8257% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Ludt + Laura Fletcher6259% gamesnot enough data
Terry Hardy + Marilyn Ludt5155% gamesnot enough data
Terry Hardy + Angela Kris224 matchesnot enough data
Dina Pisani + Laura Fletcher224 matchesnot enough data
Angela Kris + Hitomi Saheki404 matchesnot enough data
Hitomi Saheki + Trang Pham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Terry Hardy
157W–231L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.43
3.5
Debbie Davies
41W–54L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Trang Pham
147W–123L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Angela Kris
21W–9L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Marilyn Ludt
55W–32L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Hitomi Saheki
47W–64L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Laura Fletcher
79W–71L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Teresa Thonney
19W–24L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
Dina Pisani
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.