Teams

WI Combo Travel 7.5 M Team 3 Blended

2023 WI Combo · WI Combo 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesParker Christianson / Andy Taylor vs Nathan Barash / Todd Hammond6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTom Leggett / Lewis Bowen vs Christopher Jumes / David Gahagan3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJacques Verbauwhede / Jeff Wangard vs Ian Sewell / Jeffrey Saeger2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesLewis Bowen / Jacques Verbauwhede vs Bryan Snipes / Brett Meddaugh1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesParker Christianson / Jeff Wangard vs Xao Vang / David Wissink1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAndy Taylor / Tom Leggett vs Dylan Meyer / Joseph Liegel2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesLucas Mullen / Andy Taylor vs Christopher Jumes / Ian Sewell2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLucas Mullen / Andy Taylor vs Timothy Verbeke / Tung Ouy0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WI Combo 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Combo Travel 7.5 M Team 2 Hammond3193777
2WI Combo Travel 7.5 M LaCrosse Lobbers31841083
3WI Combo Travel 7.5 M Team 3 Blended0411123142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jacques Verbauwhede
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.46
Tom Leggett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.38
Lewis Bowen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Parker Christianson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Andy Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
2.84
Jonathan Paque
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Jeff Wangard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lucas Mullen
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucas Mullen + Andy Taylor4845% games+10.5% vs expected
Jacques Verbauwhede + Tom Leggett4348% gamesnot enough data
Jacques Verbauwhede + Andy Taylor134 matchesnot enough data
Jacques Verbauwhede + Parker Christianson303 matchesnot enough data
Tom Leggett + Lucas Mullen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacques Verbauwhede
74W–57L career · 11 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Tom Leggett
47W–85L career · 9 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.46
Lewis Bowen
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
Parker Christianson
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.38
3.5
Andy Taylor
34W–56L career · 13 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Paque
37W–92L career · 24 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
Jeff Wangard
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lucas Mullen
31W–43L career · 11 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.