Teams

Bruceki’s

2025 Adult 55 and Over League · 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-05-25vs Racquet MastersWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Schmidt / Shane Sumida vs Dean Kozai / William Graffigna6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCurtis Nakamura / Jordan Joanou vs Conrad Murashige / Steven Balbirona6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Heafner / Richard Brostrom vs Mike Shima / Stanley Hamada6-1, 7-5
2025-05-18vs Penn Men 7.0 55+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesShane Sumida / Daniel Schmidt vs Kyle Wright / Stuart Leong4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Gilbert / Michael Heafner vs Kyle Tom / Thomas Yoshida1-6, 3-6
2025-05-11vs Match Point 55+Split 11
L#1 DoublesCurtis Nakamura / Sheldon Shinyama vs Gil Bueno / Mark Leonard6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Pitner / Shane Sumida vs James Burkhart / Al Moy6-4, 6-2
2025-05-04vs LatecomersWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Pitner / Shane Sumida vs Nemesio Ramos / Richard Vermeesch6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Gilbert / Bruce Palenske vs Glen Masaki / Carl Yamaguchi1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-27vs OC Older DolphinsWon 20
W#2 DoublesCurtis Nakamura / Sheldon Shinyama vs Jamie Jeffryes / Victor Poppinga2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJordan Joanou / Bruce Palenske vs David Kula / Daniel Lim6-3, 6-3
2025-04-13vs Kakaako Bay RacKet ClubLost 03
L#1 DoublesCraig Pitner / Clayton Ing vs Howard Wong / Andre Moux2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Palenske / Curtis Nakamura vs Jackson Wang / Tony Tien2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Heafner / Richard Brostrom vs Daryl Ching / Leighton Oshiro2-6, 1-6
2025-04-06vs Mas Swerty BarkadasLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Schmidt / Shane Sumida vs Cy Yamamoto / Doug Michihara4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJordan Joanou / Clayton Ing vs Ranulfo Gepitulan / Cecilio Aguirre2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Palenske / Curtis Nakamura vs Jonie Lising / Jesse Tano2-6, 3-6
2025-03-30vs Doug's DudesWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Pitner / Shane Sumida vs Milton Kishaba / Norman Soohoo6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Heafner / Bruce Palenske vs Frank Allen / Bob Vega6-0, 6-1
2025-03-23vs Tennis The MenaceWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Gilbert / Curtis Nakamura vs Thomas Lake / Mike Nishikida2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClayton Ing / Bruce Palenske vs Miles Hirata / Darren Chang4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Heafner / Jordan Joanou vs Michael Ho / Anthony Chun1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-16vs Makule Hawaii 55+ 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Schmidt / Shane Sumida vs Edmund Lum / Barry Nakasone6-2, 7-5
2025-03-09vs Court JestersLost 02
L#2 DoublesCraig Pitner / Michael Heafner vs Erik Burian / Ian Greene2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCurtis Nakamura / Clayton Ing vs Mike Elhoff / Mark Landau1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Shane Sumida
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Jordan Joanou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Schmidt
published 3.5
3.23
Craig Pitner
published 3.5
3.06
David Gilbert
published 3.5
3.00
Clayton Ing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Bruce Palenske
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Michael Heafner
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.74
Curtis Nakamura
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Richard Brostrom
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Gilbert + Bruce Palenske5266% games+17.8% vs expected
Bruce Palenske + Jordan Joanou5058% games+11.1% vs expected
Shane Sumida + Jordan Joanou9262% games+8.9% vs expected
Curtis Nakamura + Clayton Ing3348% games+2.6% vs expected
Michael Heafner + Bruce Palenske131452% games+2.5% vs expected
Michael Heafner + Clayton Ing3354% games+2.4% vs expected
Curtis Nakamura + David Gilbert5546% games−1.8% vs expected
Michael Heafner + David Gilbert5946% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shane Sumida
79W–49L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Jordan Joanou
38W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Daniel Schmidt
25W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Craig Pitner
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
David Gilbert
45W–51L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Clayton Ing
36W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Bruce Palenske
63W–88L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Michael Heafner
60W–79L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Curtis Nakamura
65W–103L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Richard Brostrom
26W–37L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.