Teams

Mar.Raper18S

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-19vs Ba.Wilhelm18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Leigh Barter0-6, 0-6
2023-07-12vs Sh.Brodsgaard18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Stacey Giglio1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJackie Morse vs Marilyn Slaymaker0-6, 4-6
2023-07-06vs De.Farmer18S3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Megan Barrasso2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-28Lost 01
L#2 SinglesClaudia Cadet vs Manjula Nagaraja1-6, 4-6
2023-06-21vs Mi.Lagerstedt18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesClaudia Cadet vs Amy Cuni1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKristin Esham vs Heidi McCann4-6, 4-6
2023-06-14vs Je.Williams18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesKristin Esham vs Samantha Pickett2-6, 3-6
2023-06-14Lost 01
L#3 SinglesJackie Morse vs Beth Fletcher0-6, 1-6
2023-05-31vs Je.Wolborsky18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesClaudia Cadet vs Michelle Staub6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Jennifer Wolborsky6-3, 6-0
2023-05-24vs Da.Rusnak18S3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Jade Paunovich6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJackie Morse vs Natalie Norris2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKristin Esham vs Rondi Furgason3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Catie Cunningham
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.99
Kristin Esham
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3
2.83
Claudia Cadet
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.48
Jackie Morse
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Julia Bethune
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Cadet + Catie Cunningham4168% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Esham + Catie Cunningham303 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Cadet + Jackie Morse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catie Cunningham
98W–63L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Kristin Esham
89W–69L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Courtney Grinnell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Claudia Cadet
38W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Jackie Morse
27W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.48
Julia Bethune
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.