Teams

SD WE LLW 3.0 La Jolla TC/ Covello

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD- Women- WE 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.92 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-27vs SD 3.0 Mtn View/ LimonWon 21
W#1 DoublesYumi Miyamoto / Aileen Nemrow vs Golda Dunlap / Keiko Small6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLulu Ren vs Edith Limon7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeanne Cummings / Laurie Lopez vs Aida Padilla / Noor Hilmi2-6, 1-6
2026-06-13vs SD 3.0 PLNU (2:30PM)/ HagstromWon 21
W#1 DoublesLadan Monshi / Demet Bucher vs Victoria Lugash / Andrea Evans6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAileen Nemrow vs Wendy Collins6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeanne Cummings / Yumi Miyamoto vs Elayne Berman / Susan Schraeder4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesAngela Landen / Jill Ostrom vs Madeleine Norris / Hannah Greenwood7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAileen Nemrow vs Emily Voeller6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllyson Kreshak / Laurie Lopez vs Grace Daly / Melissa MacK2-6, 1-6
2026-05-24vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ KleinerWon 21
W#1 DoublesAileen Nemrow / Yumi Miyamoto vs Lisa Bolelli / Jennifer Austin6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTerri Lundberg vs Marina Tomczak4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Landen / Jill Ostrom vs Maren Outwater / Hillary Kleiner1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-17vs SD 3.0 PTC/ Nguyen- BosworthWon 30
W#1 DoublesDemet Bucher / Ladan Monshi vs Shelby Carlin / Grace An6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLulu Ren vs Emily Griffith6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRaquel Razon / Yumi Miyamoto vs Kayla Wiseman / Nicole Borden6-1, 6-2
2026-05-10vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ OlivaLost 12
L#1 DoublesAileen Nemrow / Ladan Monshi vs Amanda Clifford / Felicia Danielle Oliva2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTerri Lundberg vs Natalie Vaca6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJill Ostrom / Jeanne Cummings vs Stacey Hijar / Corrine Lott6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesYumi Miyamoto / Aileen Nemrow vs Irena Hukari / Rebecca Lawrence6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTerri Lundberg vs Amy Shapiro6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Ostrom / Angela Landen vs Caryn Rubanovich / Anja Dixson6-4, 6-0
2026-04-12vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ EnwrightWon 20
W#1 DoublesLulu Ren / Ladan Monshi vs Holly Amaya / Jessica Goetting6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDemet Bucher / Angela Landen vs Danielle Stroud / Kate Paradis6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · SD- Women- WE 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD WE LLW 3.0 La Jolla TC/ Covello7117716173
2SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Oliva6215924202
3SD 3.0 SDTRC/ Kleiner5317715174
4SD 3.0 Balboa Sunday Smashers/ Guyre44131124202
5SD 3.0 PTC/ Nguyen- Bosworth35101431228
6SD 3.0 PLNU (2:30PM)/ Hagstrom3591533237
7SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Enwright3591533240
8SD 3.0 Mtn View/ Limon3581635251
9SD 3.0 Sets in the City @BTC/ La Crue26101432229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Aileen Nemrow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.07
Jill Ostrom
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Ladan Monshi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Lulu Ren
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Terri Lundberg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.74
Yumi Miyamoto
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.73
Angela Landen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Raquel Razon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Demet Bucher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Jeanne Cummings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Allyson Kreshak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kelly Covello
published
Wen Liao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Cummings + Kelly Covello7272% games+15.8% vs expected
Jill Ostrom + Angela Landen8452% games+2.2% vs expected
Yumi Miyamoto + Aileen Nemrow404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Aileen Nemrow
13W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
3
Jill Ostrom
27W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Ladan Monshi
44W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Lulu Ren
13W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Terri Lundberg
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Yumi Miyamoto
20W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Angela Landen
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
Raquel Razon
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Demet Bucher
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Jeanne Cummings
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
2.5
Allyson Kreshak
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Kelly Covello
19W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Wen Liao
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.